Siemens Healthcare, Cary, NC; and daggerDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Invest Radiol. 2010 Feb;45(2):104-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c8ceac.
The purpose of this study is to determine what effects a variety of diffusion encoding techniques at 1.5 T and 3 T have on measured abdominal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained in a healthy population.
Sixteen healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this prospective Institutional Review Board-approved study following written informed consent. Imaging was performed on a 1.5 T and a 3 T magnetic resonance system (Siemens, Erlangen) with several abdominal axial diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions: an orthogonal diffusion encoding with b-values of 0/400 seconds/mm, and a series of four 3-scan trace weighted acquisitions with b-values of 0/50, 0/400, 0/800, 0/50/400/800 seconds/mm, respectively. The mean ADC values were calculated for 3 regions of interest (ROI) in 5 locations (right hepatic lobe, spleen, pancreatic head, body, and tail). The ADC data were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance.
There was a significant difference between measured ADC values at 1.5 T and 3 T for liver (P < 0.001), but not for pancreas (P = 0.427) or spleen (P = 0.167). There was no significant difference (P > 0.999) in the measured ADC values between the orthogonal encodings and the 3-scan trace weighted encoding with the same b-value. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) between all 4 weighting schemes for the 3-scan trace with the measured ADC decreasing with increasing b-value.
Measured abdominal ADC values depend on the exact selection of b-value used for encoding for liver, pancreas, and spleen. In addition, the measured ADC values depend on the field strength of the scanner for liver.
本研究旨在确定在 1.5T 和 3T 下,各种扩散编码技术对健康人群腹部表观扩散系数(ADC)值的测量有何影响。
本前瞻性机构审查委员会批准的研究共纳入 16 名健康男性志愿者,均签署书面知情同意书。在 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振系统(西门子,埃尔朗根)上进行了多次腹部轴位扩散加权成像(DWI)采集:正交扩散编码,b 值为 0/400 秒/mm,以及 4 次 3 扫描轨迹加权采集,b 值分别为 0/50、0/400、0/800、0/50/400/800 秒/mm。在 5 个部位(右肝叶、脾脏、胰头部、体部和尾部)的 3 个感兴趣区(ROI)计算平均 ADC 值。使用重复测量方差分析对 ADC 数据进行分析。
肝脏的 1.5T 和 3T 测量 ADC 值存在显著差异(P < 0.001),但胰腺(P = 0.427)或脾脏(P = 0.167)无显著差异。相同 b 值的正交编码与 3 扫描轨迹加权编码之间的测量 ADC 值无显著差异(P > 0.999)。对于 3 扫描轨迹的 4 种加权方案,测量 ADC 值均存在显著差异(P < 0.001),随着 b 值的增加,测量 ADC 值逐渐降低。
腹部 ADC 值的测量取决于用于编码的 b 值的确切选择,对于肝脏、胰腺和脾脏均如此。此外,对于肝脏,测量 ADC 值还取决于扫描仪的场强。