• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速与慢速揭除创可贴:一项随机试验。

Fast versus slow bandaid removal: a randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Townsville Hospital, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2009;191(11-12):682-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb03379.x.

DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb03379.x
PMID:20028307
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether slow or fast bandaid removal is less painful.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, randomised, crossover trial was carried out at James Cook University, Townsville. Participants were healthy volunteers from Years 2 and 3 of the James Cook University medical school program.

INTERVENTIONS

Medium-sized bandaids were applied bilaterally in three standard body locations and removed using slow and fast techniques.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain scores were assessed using an 11-point verbal numeric pain scale.

RESULTS

65 participants were included in the study. The overall mean pain score for fast bandaid removal was 0.92 and for slow bandaid removal was 1.58. This represents a highly significant difference of 0.66 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In young healthy volunteers, fast bandaid removal caused less pain than slow bandaid removal.

摘要

目的

确定缓慢或快速揭除创可贴哪个更不痛。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在詹姆斯·库克大学(James Cook University)进行的前瞻性、随机、交叉试验。参与者是詹姆斯·库克大学医学院 2 年级和 3 年级的健康志愿者。

干预措施

在三个标准身体部位双侧贴上中等大小的创可贴,然后分别用慢揭和快揭的方法揭除。

主要观察指标

使用 11 分制数字疼痛评分量表评估疼痛评分。

结果

65 名参与者纳入研究。快速揭除创可贴的总体平均疼痛评分为 0.92,而缓慢揭除创可贴的疼痛评分为 1.58。这代表着非常显著的 0.66 分差异(P < 0.001)。

结论

在年轻健康的志愿者中,快速揭除创可贴比缓慢揭除创可贴引起的疼痛更小。

相似文献

1
Fast versus slow bandaid removal: a randomised trial.快速与慢速揭除创可贴:一项随机试验。
Med J Aust. 2009;191(11-12):682-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb03379.x.
2
Conservative interventions for treating middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults.青少年和成人中三分之一锁骨骨折的保守治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD007121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007121.pub4.
3
Impregnated acetate gauze compared with lipido-colloid contact layer at dressing removal pain: a single-blind cross-over randomised control trial.在换药疼痛方面,浸渍醋酸纱布与脂质胶体接触层的比较:一项单盲交叉随机对照试验。
J Wound Care. 2019 Feb 2;28(2):89-101. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.2.89.
4
Does the β-receptor antagonist esmolol have analgesic effects?: A randomised placebo-controlled cross-over study on healthy volunteers undergoing the cold pressor test.β受体阻滞剂艾司洛尔是否具有镇痛作用?一项在健康志愿者中进行的冷加压试验的随机安慰剂对照交叉研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Mar;35(3):165-172. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000711.
5
Conservative interventions for treating middle third clavicle fractures in adolescents and adults.青少年和成人中三分之一锁骨骨折的保守治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 30(5):CD007121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007121.pub3.
6
Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, prilocaine, and lidocaine in the management of pain and hemorrhage during nasal pack removal.比较罗哌卡因、布比卡因、丙胺卡因和利多卡因在鼻填塞取出过程中对疼痛和出血的管理作用。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):423-5. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3945.
7
Comparison of pain perception during miniscrew placement in orthodontic patients with a visual analog scale survey between compound topical and needle-injected anesthetics: A crossover, prospective, randomized clinical trial.在正畸患者中使用视觉模拟量表调查比较复合外用麻醉剂和针剂注射麻醉剂在微螺钉植入过程中的疼痛感知:一项交叉、前瞻性、随机临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.08.013.
8
The effect of benzocaine and ketoprofen gels on pain during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment: a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.苯佐卡因凝胶和酮洛芬凝胶对固定正畸矫治器治疗期间疼痛的影响:一项随机、双盲、交叉试验。
Aust Orthod J. 2016 May;32(1):64-72.
9
A comparative, single-blind, randomized trial of pain associated with suction or non-suction drains after gynecologic laparoscopy.妇科腹腔镜术后与吸引或非吸引引流相关的疼痛的比较、单盲、随机试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 May 30.
10
Factors associated with self-reported pain scores among ED patients.与 ED 患者自我报告疼痛评分相关的因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;30(2):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Mar 1.