Suppr超能文献

成年人紧张型头痛预防性药物无效:系统评价。

Lack of benefit for prophylactic drugs of tension-type headache in adults: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2010 Apr;27(2):151-65. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp089. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of prophylactic drugs for chronic tension-type headache (TTH) in adults.

METHODS

We searched several databases from inception to August 2009. We selected randomized trials that reported the effects of prophylactic drugs in patients with TTH, with a pain measure (intensity, frequency, duration, improvement or index) as outcome measure. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data from the original reports. A data synthesis was carried out according to the type of medication.

RESULTS

We included 44 trials (3399 patients), of which 15 (34.1%) were considered to be of low risk of bias. Main types of medications studied were antidepressants, muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines and vasodilator agents. Overall, antidepressants were no more effective than placebo, and there were no significant differences between different types of antidepressants. There was conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of benzodiazepines and vasodilator agents compared with placebo. Furthermore, there was limited evidence that propranolol had negative effects on depression in TTH patients, when compared with placebo or biofeedback. There was no evidence concerning the effectiveness of muscle relaxants alone or 5-HT receptor agonist compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, antidepressants were no more effective on headache intensity or frequency and analgesic use than placebo. Propranolol seemed to have negative effects on depression in TTH patients when compared with placebo or biofeedback. No evidence was found for the use of muscle relaxants alone or 5-HT receptor agonist.

摘要

目的

评估预防性药物治疗成人慢性紧张型头痛(TTH)的疗效和耐受性。

方法

我们从建库到 2009 年 8 月检索了多个数据库。我们选择了报告预防性药物对 TTH 患者疗效的随机试验,以疼痛测量(强度、频率、持续时间、改善或指数)作为结果测量。两位作者独立评估了偏倚风险,并从原始报告中提取了数据。根据药物类型进行了数据综合。

结果

我们纳入了 44 项试验(3399 例患者),其中 15 项(34.1%)被认为偏倚风险较低。研究的主要药物类型是抗抑郁药、肌肉松弛剂、苯二氮䓬类药物和血管扩张剂。总体而言,抗抑郁药并不比安慰剂更有效,而且不同类型的抗抑郁药之间没有显著差异。关于苯二氮䓬类药物和血管扩张剂与安慰剂相比的有效性存在相互矛盾的证据。此外,有有限的证据表明普萘洛尔与安慰剂或生物反馈相比对 TTH 患者的抑郁有负面影响。关于肌肉松弛剂单独或 5-HT 受体激动剂与安慰剂相比的有效性没有证据。

结论

总体而言,抗抑郁药在头痛强度或频率和镇痛药使用方面并不比安慰剂更有效。与安慰剂或生物反馈相比,普萘洛尔似乎对 TTH 患者的抑郁有负面影响。没有证据表明单独使用肌肉松弛剂或 5-HT 受体激动剂有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验