Cao Qing, Zhu Yun, Ruan Ying-qin, Yong Li-jun, Wang Xiao-hong, Zhang Wen-hui
Foping National Nature Reserve, Foping 723400, Shaanxi, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2009 Sep;20(9):2271-6.
By using line transect method, the distribution patterns of giant panda population and its sympatric companion wildlife species in Foping and Guanyinshan nature reserves were investigated in October 2007 and April 2008, and the environmental factors affecting the spatial distribution of giant panda activity were analyzed. The giant panda population and its sympatric companion wildlife species in the two reserves had the similar distribution patterns, and the density and distribution range of giant panda were smaller in Guanyinshan than in Foping. Giant panda had two high-density distribution areas in Foping, but no activity trace in most parts of Guanyinshan. The activity trace of Budorcas taxicolor, Naemorhedus goral and Sus scrofa was more in Guanyinshan than in Foping. Anthropogenic interference might affect the distribution pattern of giant panda.
2007年10月和2008年4月，采用样线法对佛坪和观音山自然保护区大熊猫种群及其同域伴生野生动物物种的分布格局进行了调查，并分析了影响大熊猫活动空间分布的环境因素。两个保护区的大熊猫种群及其同域伴生野生动物物种具有相似的分布格局，观音山的大熊猫密度和分布范围比佛坪小。佛坪有两个大熊猫高密度分布区，而观音山大部分地区没有大熊猫活动痕迹。羚牛、斑羚和野猪在观音山的活动痕迹比在佛坪多。人为干扰可能会影响大熊猫的分布格局。
