Liu Xuehua, Wu Pengfeng, Shao Xiaoming, Songer Melissa, Cai Qiong, He Xiangbo, Zhu Yun
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, and School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jul;24(19):16465-16477. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9232-x. Epub 2017 May 27.
Environmental heterogeneity contributes to various habitats and may influence the diversity and activity patterns of wildlife among habitats. We used camera traps to assess wildlife habitat use in Guanyinshan Nature Reserve from 2009 to 2012. We focused on four types of habitat including open areas with gentle slope (<15°) (Type1), low elevation areas (about 1500-1700 m) with high bamboo coverage (Type2), high elevation areas (about 2100-2300 m) with high canopy coverage (Type3), and wildlife migration passages (Type4). We analyzed the differences in species richness, relative abundance index (RAI), species diversity, and animals' activity pattern among habitats. Total six species were analyzed on activity pattern, which are Takin (Budorcas taxicolor), tufted deer (Elaphodus cephalophus), Himalayan goral (Naemorhedus goral), wild boar (Sus scrofa), golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus), and porcupine (Hystrix hodgsoni). The results are (1) that there were significant differences in richness and RAI among habitats; (2) Type4 habitat had the highest richness and RAI while Type2 had the highest species diversity; giant pandas were found in these two habitats; (3) there were significant differences in species' activity during daytime and nighttime; and (4) differences appeared in habitat preference of the most abundant species. Takin and tufted deer preferred Type1, Himalayan goral preferred Type2, and golden pheasant preferred Type3. Type4 habitat was used by most animals. All these revealed that habitat heterogeneity plays an important role in species diversity and the importance for conservation.
环境异质性造就了多样的栖息地,并可能影响不同栖息地中野生动物的多样性和活动模式。我们于2009年至2012年使用相机陷阱评估了观音山自然保护区内野生动物对栖息地的利用情况。我们重点关注了四种栖息地类型,包括缓坡(<15°)开阔区域(类型1)、竹覆盖度高的低海拔区域(约1500 - 1700米)(类型2)、树冠覆盖度高的高海拔区域(约2100 - 2300米)(类型3)以及野生动物迁徙通道(类型4)。我们分析了不同栖息地之间物种丰富度、相对丰度指数(RAI)、物种多样性和动物活动模式的差异。共对六种动物的活动模式进行了分析,它们是扭角羚(Budorcas taxicolor)、毛冠鹿(Elaphodus cephalophus)、喜马拉雅斑羚(Naemorhedus goral)、野猪(Sus scrofa)、红腹锦鸡(Chrysolophus pictus)和豪猪(Hystrix hodgsoni)。结果如下:(1)不同栖息地之间的丰富度和RAI存在显著差异;(2)类型4栖息地的丰富度和RAI最高,而类型2栖息地的物种多样性最高;大熊猫出现在这两种栖息地中;(3)物种在白天和夜间的活动存在显著差异;(4)数量最多的物种在栖息地偏好上存在差异。扭角羚和毛冠鹿偏好类型1栖息地,喜马拉雅斑羚偏好类型2栖息地,红腹锦鸡偏好类型3栖息地。大多数动物使用类型4栖息地。所有这些都表明栖息地异质性在物种多样性及保护重要性方面发挥着重要作用。