Basaure Mauro
Instituto de Humanidades, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile.
Hist Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;20(79 Pt 3):340-59. doi: 10.1177/0957154X08337638.
What psychiatry was for the anti-psychiatry movement, psychoanalysis was for the French 'Anti-Oedipus movement' represented by Robert Castel, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. Until now, the contribution of Foucault to this critical movement has been little known. In this paper I reconstruct in a systematic and exhaustive way Foucault's critique of psychoanalysis and, in particular, of the Oedipus-complex theory. I demonstrate that this critique presupposes a very specific epistemology and social theory. On an epistemological level, Foucault focuses on the power effects of psychoanalysis as a discourse of subjectivity. On a social-theoretical level, Foucault assumes a functionalist conception of society. These two aspects of Foucault's critique of psychoanalysis have not been adequately recognized in the discussion about his relationship to psychoanalysis (Derrida, Miller, Whitebook, among others). I argue that a fruitful dialogue between a Foucault-inspired critical social theory and psychoanalysis can take place only if these two distinct aspects are taken into account.
就反精神病学运动而言精神分析学的情况,正如精神医学对于反精神病学运动一样,精神分析学对于以罗伯特·卡斯特尔、吉尔·德勒兹和费利克斯·加塔利为代表的法国“反俄狄浦斯运动”也是如此。到目前为止,福柯对这一批判运动的贡献鲜为人知。在本文中,我以系统且详尽的方式重构了福柯对精神分析学的批判,尤其是对俄狄浦斯情结理论的批判。我证明,这种批判预设了一种非常特殊的认识论和社会理论。在认识论层面,福柯关注精神分析学作为一种主体性话语的权力效应。在社会理论层面,福柯假定了一种社会的功能主义观念。在关于他与精神分析学关系的讨论中(德里达、米勒、怀特布克等人),福柯对精神分析学批判的这两个方面并未得到充分认识。我认为,只有考虑到这两个不同的方面,受福柯启发的批判社会理论与精神分析学之间才能进行富有成效的对话。