Roberts Marc
Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Media and Design, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Nurs Philos. 2007 Apr;8(2):114-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2007.00306.x.
Published in 1972, Anti-Oedipus was the first of a number of collaborative works between the French philosopher, Gilles Deleuze, and the French psychoanalyst and political activist, Felix Guattari. As the first of a two-volume body of work that bears the subtitle, Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Anti-Oedipus is, to say the least, an unconventional work that should be understood, in part, as a product of its time--created as it was among the political and revolutionary fervour engendered by the events of 'May 1968'. However, this paper will suggest that Anti-Oedipus--as a critique of psychoanalysis and the Oedipus complex, as well as being a study of the relationship between capitalism and schizophrenia--should also be understood in a less 'time-bound' fashion. In particular, the paper will examine Deleuze and Guattari's formulation of a concept of 'desire' and its employment in relation to subjectivity, time, capitalism, representation, and the radical 'therapeutic' practice that they refer to as 'schizoanalysis'. Moreover, nearly 40 years after the events of May 1968 and against possible doubts concerning the contemporary relevance of psychoanalysis, it will be suggested that psychoanalysis and the Oedipus complex are to be understood as symptomatic of a wider 'malaise' that can be discerned within psychiatry, psychotherapy, and contemporary capitalist society itself, and that it is this that forms the broader target of the book's critique. Accordingly, by providing an accessible and critical introduction to Anti-Oedipus, the paper also hopes to stimulate further discussion and research regarding both the critique and the contribution that the work can make to contemporary psychiatry, psychotherapy, and mental health nursing generally.
《反俄狄浦斯》出版于1972年,是法国哲学家吉尔·德勒兹与法国精神分析学家及政治活动家费利克斯·加塔利诸多合作著作中的第一部。作为一部副标题为《资本主义与精神分裂》的两卷本著作的开篇之作,《反俄狄浦斯》至少可以说是一部非传统的作品,部分应被理解为其所处时代的产物——它创作于由“1968年五月风暴”引发的政治和革命热潮之中。然而,本文将表明,《反俄狄浦斯》——作为对精神分析和俄狄浦斯情结的批判,以及对资本主义与精神分裂关系的研究——也应以一种不那么受“时间限制”的方式来理解。具体而言,本文将审视德勒兹和加塔利对“欲望”概念的阐述及其在主体性、时间、资本主义、表征以及他们所提及的激进“治疗”实践“精神分裂分析”方面的应用。此外,在“1968年五月风暴”过去近40年后,针对精神分析在当代的相关性可能存在的疑虑,本文将提出,精神分析和俄狄浦斯情结应被理解为在精神病学、心理治疗以及当代资本主义社会本身中可被察觉的更广泛“不适”的症状,而这正是该书批判的更广泛目标。因此,通过对《反俄狄浦斯》进行通俗易懂且批判性的介绍,本文还希望激发关于该作品对当代精神病学、心理治疗以及总体精神健康护理的批判和贡献的进一步讨论与研究。