Concannon Thomas W, Griffith John L, Kent David M, Normand Sharon-Lise, Newhouse Joseph P, Atkins James, Beshansky Joni R, Selker Harry P
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Jan;2(1):9-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.813741. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
In patients with a major cardiac event, the first priority is to minimize time to treatment. For many patients, first contact with the health system is through emergency medical services (EMS). We set out to identify patient-level and neighborhood-level factors that were associated with elapsed time in EMS.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 10 municipalities in Dallas County, Tex, from January 1 through December 31, 2004. The data set included 5887 patients with suspected cardiac-related symptoms. The region was served by 29 hospitals and 98 EMS depots. Multivariate models included measures of distance traveled, time of day, day of week, and patient and neighborhood characteristics. The main outcomes were elapsed time in EMS (continuous; in minutes) and delay in EMS (dichotomous; >15 minutes beyond median elapsed time). We found positive associations between patient characteristics and both average elapsed time and delay in EMS care. Variation in average elapsed time was not large enough to be clinically meaningful. However, approximately 11% (n=647) of patients were delayed >or=15 minutes. Women were more likely to be delayed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 1.74), and this association did not change after adjusting for other characteristics, including neighborhood socioeconomic composition.
Compared with otherwise similar men, women have 50% greater odds of being delayed in the EMS setting. The determinants of delay should be a special focus of EMS studies in which time to treatment is a priority.
在发生重大心脏事件的患者中,首要任务是尽量缩短治疗时间。对许多患者而言,与医疗系统的首次接触是通过紧急医疗服务(EMS)。我们旨在确定与EMS中耗时相关的患者层面和社区层面因素。
2004年1月1日至12月31日在得克萨斯州达拉斯县的10个市进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据集包括5887例有疑似心脏相关症状的患者。该地区由29家医院和98个EMS站点提供服务。多变量模型纳入了行程距离、一天中的时间、一周中的日期以及患者和社区特征等指标。主要结局为EMS中的耗时(连续变量;以分钟计)和EMS延误(二分变量;超过中位耗时15分钟以上)。我们发现患者特征与EMS护理的平均耗时和延误均呈正相关。平均耗时的差异在临床上无足够意义。然而,约11%(n = 647)的患者延误≥15分钟。女性更易出现延误(调整后的优势比为1.52;95%置信区间为1.32至1.74),在调整包括社区社会经济构成等其他特征后,这种关联并未改变。
与其他方面相似的男性相比,女性在EMS环境中出现延误的几率高50%。在治疗时间至关重要的EMS研究中,延误的决定因素应成为特别关注的焦点。