• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌的最佳淋巴结清扫术。

Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee
PMID:20032718
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Using Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration data, we sought to (1) characterize the relationship between survival and extent of lymphadenectomy, and (2) from this, define optimum lymphadenectomy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

What constitutes optimum lymphadenectomy to maximize survival is controversial because of variable goals, analytic methodology, and generalizability of the underpinning data.

METHODS

A total of 4627 patients who had esophagectomy alone for esophageal cancer were identified from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Patient-specific risk-adjusted survival was estimated using random survival forests. Risk-adjusted 5-year survival was averaged for each number of lymph nodes resected and its relation to cancer characteristics explored. Optimum number of nodes that should be resected to maximize 5-year survival was determined by random forest multivariable regression.

RESULTS

For pN0M0 moderately and poorly differentiated cancers, and all node-positive (pN+) cancers, 5-year survival improved with increasing extent of lymphadenectomy. In pN0M0 cancers, no optimum lymphadenectomy was defined for pTis; optimum lymphadenectomy was 10 to 12 nodes for pT1, 15 to 22 for pT2, and 31 to 42 for pT3/T4, depending on histopathologic cell type. In pN+M0 cancers and 1 to 6 nodes positive, optimum lymphadenectomy was 10 for pT1, 15 for pT2, and 29 to 50 for pT3/T4.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with increased survival for all patients with esophageal cancer except at the extremes (TisN0M0 and >or=7 regional lymph nodes positive for cancer) and well-differentiated pN0M0 cancer. Maximum 5-year survival is modulated by T classification: resecting 10 nodes for pT1, 20 for pT2, and >or=30 for pT3/T4 is recommended.

摘要

目的

利用全球食管癌协作组的数据,我们旨在(1)描述生存与淋巴结清扫范围之间的关系,以及(2)由此确定最佳淋巴结清扫范围。

摘要背景数据

由于目标、分析方法以及基础数据的通用性存在差异,因此,何种淋巴结清扫范围能够实现最佳生存尚存争议。

方法

我们从全球食管癌协作组数据库中确定了 4627 例单独接受食管癌切除术的患者。使用随机生存森林法估计患者特异性风险调整生存情况。对每个切除淋巴结数的风险调整 5 年生存率进行平均计算,并对其与癌症特征的关系进行了研究。通过随机森林多变量回归确定了为最大化 5 年生存率应切除的最佳淋巴结数量。

结果

对于 pN0M0 中低分化癌和所有淋巴结阳性(pN+)癌,随着淋巴结清扫范围的扩大,5 年生存率得到提高。在 pN0M0 癌症中,pTis 无最佳淋巴结清扫范围;pT1 最佳淋巴结清扫范围为 10 至 12 个,pT2 为 15 至 22 个,pT3/T4 为 31 至 42 个,具体取决于组织病理学细胞类型。在 pN+M0 癌症和 1 至 6 个淋巴结阳性的情况下,pT1 的最佳淋巴结清扫范围为 10 个,pT2 为 15 个,pT3/T4 为 29 至 50 个。

结论

除了两端(TisN0M0 和> 7 个区域淋巴结有癌症转移)和高分化 pN0M0 癌症外,对所有食管癌患者进行更大范围的淋巴结清扫与生存获益相关。最大 5 年生存率受 T 分类的调节:推荐对 pT1 切除 10 个淋巴结,对 pT2 切除 20 个淋巴结,对 pT3/T4 切除> 或=30 个淋巴结。

相似文献

1
Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌的最佳淋巴结清扫术。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):46-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee.
2
Esophageal Cancer: Associations With (pN+) Lymph Node Metastases.食管癌:与(pN+)淋巴结转移的关联
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):122-129. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001594.
3
Significance of three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus based on depth of tumor infiltration, lymph nodal involvement and survival rate.基于肿瘤浸润深度、淋巴结受累情况及生存率探讨三野淋巴结清扫术对胸段食管癌的意义。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999 Oct;40(5):737-40.
4
Value of Lymphadenectomy in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.新辅助治疗食管腺癌患者淋巴结清扫的价值。
Ann Surg. 2021 Oct 1;274(4):e320-e327. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003598.
5
Worldwide Oesophageal Cancer Collaboration guidelines for lymphadenectomy predict survival following neoadjuvant therapy.全球食管癌协作组淋巴结清扫指南预测新辅助治疗后生存。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Oct;42(4):659-64. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs105. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
6
Extent of lymph node removal during esophageal cancer surgery and survival.食管癌手术中淋巴结清扫的范围与生存。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 5;107(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv043. Print 2015 May.
7
Total Lymphadenectomy and Nodes-Based Prognostic Factors in Surgical Intervention for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.食管腺癌手术干预中的全淋巴结切除术及基于淋巴结的预后因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 May;101(5):1915-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
[Analysis of the survival in patients after surgical resection of thoracic esophageal cancer].[胸段食管癌手术切除术后患者的生存分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;31(7):541-5.
9
Does lymphadenectomy add anything to the treatment of esophageal cancer?淋巴结清扫术对食管癌治疗有额外益处吗?
Adv Surg. 1999;33:311-27.
10
Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for submucosal esophageal cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.黏膜下食管癌行扩大淋巴结清扫的食管切除术:长期结果和预后因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):750-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2023-6. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Facility Size on Perioperative Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for 14 152 Patients With Esophageal Cancer Based on the Japanese National Clinical Database: A Multicenter Cohort Study.基于日本国家临床数据库的14152例食管癌患者微创食管切除术中手术设施规模对围手术期结局的影响:一项多中心队列研究
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2025 May 1;9(5):942-951. doi: 10.1002/ags3.70027. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic model for overall survival in pN0 esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a SEER database-based study.新辅助化疗后pN0期食管癌患者总生存预后模型的建立与验证:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的研究
J Thorac Dis. 2025 May 30;17(5):3326-3344. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-910. Epub 2025 May 27.
3
A randomized controlled trial exploring the effect of placement versus nonplacement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy.一项随机对照试验,探讨在McKeown食管癌切除术中,在颈部吻合口周围放置与不放置引流管的效果。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82623-0.
4
Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Esophageal Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.食管癌前哨淋巴结定位:现状与未来方向
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17479-3.
5
The optimal number of lymph node dissections in three-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large retrospective study.食管鳞状细胞癌三野淋巴结清扫术中淋巴结清扫的最佳数量:一项大型回顾性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 5;410(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03686-9.
6
Comparison of CO artificial pneumothoraces and bronchial blockers in lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve during robot-assisted esophagectomy.机器人辅助食管癌切除术中左喉返神经旁淋巴结清扫时CO2人工气胸与支气管封堵器的比较
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2534-2539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11641-4. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
7
Effects of surgical approach and downstaging in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a 2010-2020 National Cancer Database (NCDB) study.手术方式及降期对接受新辅助化疗的食管腺癌患者的影响:一项2010 - 2020年国家癌症数据库(NCDB)研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1885-1892. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11495-2. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
8
Role of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging evaluation of esophageal cancer: a narrative review.高分辨率磁共振成像在食管癌术前肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期评估中的作用:一项叙述性综述
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):9589-9599. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-34. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
9
Number of Resected Lymph Nodes and Survival Status in Node-Negative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cohort Study.无淋巴结转移的食管鳞状细胞癌患者的切除淋巴结数量与生存状态:一项队列研究
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Oct 14;17:4633-4643. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S480893. eCollection 2024.
10
Impact of the number of lymph node dissections and a novel risk stratification on the prognosis in elderly locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.淋巴结清扫数量及一种新的风险分层对老年局部晚期食管腺癌预后的影响
J Cancer. 2024 Jun 3;15(13):4197-4204. doi: 10.7150/jca.96574. eCollection 2024.