Raina Sachin M, Dickerson Clark R
Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2N 1K5.
Work. 2009;34(2):205-13. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2009-0917.
Despite frequent use in industry, job rotation lacks robust confirmation as an effective method to limit exposure. This study investigated two tasks that involved the deltoid muscle. We examined two major factors in the context of muscle fatigue: the presence of rotation between tasks, and the order of task rotation if rotation was present. Participants performed four task combinations (coded AA, AB, BA, BB) of two tasks that were intended to produce fatigue (A: repetitive shoulder flexion; B: repetitive shoulder abduction). All tested conditions resulted in lower maximum force production capability (mean range of 78-88% of original strength), in this order of decreasing magnitude: BB --> AB --> BA --> AA, though differences between successive levels were not always significant. Specific muscle results supported this progression of strength decreases. For tasks with different muscular demands (AB and BA), it was less fatiguing to rotate between them than to only perform the more demanding task (BB). The order of rotation between tasks (AB vs. BA) did not influence muscle fatigue indicators. These findings help to assess the effectiveness of rotating between different tasks in reducing muscular fatigue or exposure. They also indicated a low apparent influence of task order on terminal fatigue characteristics for the task combinations evaluated.
尽管工作轮换在行业中经常被使用,但作为一种限制接触的有效方法,它缺乏有力的证实。本研究调查了两项涉及三角肌的任务。我们在肌肉疲劳的背景下研究了两个主要因素:任务之间是否存在轮换,以及如果存在轮换,任务轮换的顺序。参与者执行了两项旨在产生疲劳的任务的四种任务组合(编码为AA、AB、BA、BB)(A:重复性肩部屈曲;B:重复性肩部外展)。所有测试条件下,最大力量产生能力均降低(平均范围为原始力量的78 - 88%),按降幅大小依次为:BB --> AB --> BA --> AA,不过连续水平之间的差异并不总是显著的。特定肌肉的结果支持了力量下降的这一趋势。对于具有不同肌肉需求的任务(AB和BA),在它们之间轮换比只执行要求更高的任务(BB)更不容易疲劳。任务之间的轮换顺序(AB与BA)并未影响肌肉疲劳指标。这些发现有助于评估在不同任务之间轮换在减少肌肉疲劳或接触方面的有效性。它们还表明,对于所评估的任务组合,任务顺序对最终疲劳特征的影响较小。