Singh N N, Deitz D E, Epstein M H, Singh J
Commonwealth Institute for Child and Family Studies, Richmond, VA 23201.
Behav Modif. 1991 Jan;15(1):74-94. doi: 10.1177/01454455910151005.
The social behavior of students who are seriously emotionally disturbed sets them apart from their normative classroom peers. This article provides a quantitative analysis of intervention studies dealing with the social behavior of seriously emotionally disturbed students. Social behavior was broadly defined as including social skills deficits, behavior under inadequate stimulus control, and inappropriate behavior in the classroom. Of the 28 studies located, 11 dealt with some aspect of social skills and 17 with inappropriate classroom behavior. Each study was analyzed with respect to (a) the age, gender, and classification of the subjects; (b) the setting, referral source, and therapist; (c) the dependent and independent variables; (d) type of evaluation design used; (e) reliability of the dependent and independent variable; (f) social validation; (g) programmed generalization, maintenance, and follow-up; (h) measurement of collateral behaviors; (i) functional analysis of the target behavior; and (j) efficacy rating of the results on a 3-point scale. The results are presented and discussed in terms of current status and implications for future research.
严重情绪障碍学生的社会行为使他们有别于正常班级中的同龄人。本文对针对严重情绪障碍学生社会行为的干预研究进行了定量分析。社会行为被宽泛地定义为包括社交技能缺陷、在刺激控制不足情况下的行为以及课堂上的不当行为。在所找到的28项研究中,11项涉及社交技能的某些方面,17项涉及课堂不当行为。对每项研究从以下方面进行了分析:(a) 受试者的年龄、性别和分类;(b) 环境、转介来源和治疗师;(c) 因变量和自变量;(d) 所使用的评估设计类型;(e) 因变量和自变量的可靠性;(f) 社会效度;(g) 程序推广、维持和随访;(h) 伴随行为的测量;(i) 目标行为的功能分析;以及(j) 结果在3分制上的疗效评级。根据当前状况和对未来研究的启示呈现并讨论了结果。