• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士主导的初级保健中心心血管风险管理的效果:一项随机试验。

Effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a randomised trial.

机构信息

Department of Integrated Care, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Centre/CAPHRI Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;60(570):40-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X482095.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp10X482095
PMID:20040167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2801783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A substantial part of cardiovascular disease prevention is delivered in primary care. Special attention should be paid to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. According to the Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management, the heavy workload of cardiovascular risk management for GPs could be shared with advanced practice nurses.

AIM

To investigate the clinical effectiveness of practice nurses acting as substitutes for GPs in cardiovascular risk management after 1 year of follow-up.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Prospective pragmatic randomised trial.

SETTING

Primary care in the south of the Netherlands. Six centres (25 GPs, six nurses) participated.

METHOD

A total of 1626 potentially eligible patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease were randomised to a practice nurse group (n = 808) or a GP group (n = 818) in 2006. In total, 701 patients were included in the trial. The Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management was used as the protocol, with standardised techniques for risk assessment. Changes in the following risk factors after 1 year were measured: lipids, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. In addition, patients in the GP group received a brief questionnaire.

RESULTS

A larger decrease in the mean level of risk factors was observed in the practice nurse group compared with the GP group. After controlling for confounders, only the larger decrease in total cholesterol in the practice nurse group was statistically significant (P = 0.01, two-sided).

CONCLUSION

Advanced practice nurses are achieving results, equal to or better than GPs for the management of risk factors. The findings of this study support the involvement of practice nurses in cardiovascular risk management in Dutch primary care.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病预防的很大一部分是在初级保健中进行的。应特别注意评估心血管危险因素。根据荷兰心血管风险管理指南,全科医生的心血管风险管理工作量很大,可以与高级执业护士分担。

目的

在 1 年的随访后,调查执业护士替代全科医生进行心血管风险管理的临床效果。

研究设计

前瞻性实用随机试验。

设置

荷兰南部的基层医疗。有 6 个中心(25 名全科医生,6 名护士)参与。

方法

共有 1626 名患有心血管疾病高危的潜在合格患者于 2006 年被随机分配到执业护士组(n = 808)或全科医生组(n = 818)。共有 701 名患者参加了试验。该试验采用了荷兰心血管风险管理指南作为方案,使用标准化的风险评估技术。测量了 1 年后以下风险因素的变化:血脂、收缩压和体重指数。此外,全科医生组的患者还接受了一份简短的问卷。

结果

与全科医生组相比,执业护士组的平均风险因素水平下降幅度更大。在控制了混杂因素后,只有执业护士组总胆固醇的较大降幅具有统计学意义(P = 0.01,双侧)。

结论

高级执业护士在管理风险因素方面取得的结果与全科医生相当,甚至更好。这项研究的结果支持在荷兰初级保健中引入执业护士参与心血管风险管理。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a randomised trial.护士主导的初级保健中心心血管风险管理的效果:一项随机试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jan;60(570):40-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X482095.
2
Improving patient adherence to lifestyle advice (IMPALA): a cluster-randomised controlled trial on the implementation of a nurse-led intervention for cardiovascular risk management in primary care (protocol).改善患者对生活方式建议的依从性(IMPALA):一项关于在初级保健中实施护士主导的心血管风险管理干预措施的整群随机对照试验(方案)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 14;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-9.
3
Experiences of doctors and nurses implementing nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a qualitative study.医生和护士在初级保健中实施护士主导的心血管疾病预防的经验:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Aug;67(8):1758-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05627.x.
4
Adherence to a guideline on cardiovascular prevention: a comparison between general practitioners and practice nurses.遵循心血管预防指南:全科医生与执业护士的比较。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Jul;48(7):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
5
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.改善家族性乳腺癌遗传咨询的转诊流程:两项干预措施的三项随机对照试验结果
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030.
6
How good are GPs at adhering to a pragmatic trial protocol in primary care? Results from the ADDITION-Cambridge cluster-randomised pragmatic trial.在初级医疗保健中,全科医生遵循实用试验方案的能力如何?ADDITION - 剑桥整群随机实用试验的结果。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e015295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015295.
7
Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group.非工作时间初级医疗中护士电话咨询的安全性与有效性:随机对照试验。南威尔特郡非工作时间项目(SWOOP)组
BMJ. 1998 Oct 17;317(7165):1054-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7165.1054.
8
Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care.在初级医疗保健中护士替代医生的情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD001271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001271.pub2.
9
Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care.整群随机对照试验,比较在初级保健中促进冠心病二级预防的三种方法。
BMJ. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1338.
10
Nurse practitioner management of acute in-hours home visit or assessment requests: a pilot study.执业护士对急性非工作时间家访或评估请求的管理:一项试点研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Jan;59(558):7-11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X394798.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing physical health care for patients with severe mental illness: describing the implementation of a physical health liaison nurse in a mental health outreach team for long-term care.加强对重症精神疾病患者的身体健康护理:描述在长期护理心理健康外展团队中实施身体健康联络护士的情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Jul 15;18(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07386-x.
2
Effects of task-shifting from primary care physicians to nurses: an overview of systematic reviews.从初级保健医生向护士进行任务转移的效果:系统评价概述。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Nov 11;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00956-3.
3
The effectiveness of the role of advanced nurse practitioners compared to physician-led or usual care: A systematic review.与医生主导的护理或常规护理相比,高级执业护士角色的有效性:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Jun 17;3:100034. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100034. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Cardiovascular risk reduction with integrated care: results of 8 years follow up.综合护理降低心血管风险:8 年随访结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 8;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02010-y.
5
Promoting nurse-led behaviour change interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in disadvantaged communities: A scoping review.促进以护士为主导的行为改变干预措施,以预防弱势社区的心血管疾病:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):2071-2095. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13867. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
6
Long-term hospital-based secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.长期基于医院的冠心病二级预防:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Dec 16;21(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02426-3.
7
Advanced Practice Nursing in Cardiology: The Slovak Perspective for the Role Development and Implementation.心血管病高级护理实践:角色发展和实施的斯洛伐克观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;18(16):8543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168543.
8
Discussing lifestyle behaviors: perspectives and experiences of general practitioners.探讨生活方式行为:全科医生的观点与经验
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019 Aug 5;7(1):290-307. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1648216.
9
Patients' experiences of the caring encounter in health promotion practice: a qualitative study in Swedish primary health care.患者在健康促进实践中对关护遭遇的体验:瑞典初级卫生保健中的一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 11;21(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01296-6.
10
Task shifting of cardiovascular risk assessment and communication by nurses for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in a tertiary health care setting of Northern India.在印度北部的一家三级保健医疗机构中,护士对心血管疾病的一级和二级预防进行心血管风险评估和沟通的任务转移。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 3;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4864-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries.日常实践中的心血管疾病预防指南:八个欧洲国家的EUROASPIRE I、II和III调查比较
Lancet. 2009 Mar 14;373(9667):929-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60330-5.
2
Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of high blood pressure in a Swiss city general population: the CoLaus study.瑞士某城市普通人群中高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率及控制率:CoLaus研究
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Feb;16(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32831e9511.
3
Indications and requirements for the use of prerandomization.随机分组前的使用指征和要求。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.07.010. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
4
Dyslipidemia in primary care--prevalence, recognition, treatment and control: data from the German Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk Project (GEMCAS).基层医疗中的血脂异常——患病率、识别、治疗与控制:来自德国代谢与心血管风险项目(GEMCAS)的数据
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2008 Oct 15;7:31. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-7-31.
5
Nurse-coordinated multidisciplinary, family-based cardiovascular disease prevention programme (EUROACTION) for patients with coronary heart disease and asymptomatic individuals at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a paired, cluster-randomised controlled trial.针对冠心病患者和心血管疾病高危无症状个体的护士协调多学科家庭式心血管疾病预防项目(EUROACTION):一项配对、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2008 Jun 14;371(9629):1999-2012. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60868-5.
6
Effectiveness of general practice nurse interventions in cardiac risk factor reduction among adults.全科护士干预对降低成年人心脏危险因素的有效性。
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jun;62(5):530-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04671.x.
7
Disease management programme for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and heart failure in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中冠心病和心力衰竭二级预防的疾病管理项目:一项整群随机对照试验。
Heart. 2007 Nov;93(11):1398-405. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.106955. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
8
Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in US adults.美国成年人中自我报告的BMI与测量的BMI作为疾病标志物相关性的比较。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Jan;15(1):188-96. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.504.
9
The feasibility of a primary care model for the management of COPD.一种用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的初级保健模式的可行性。
Prim Care Respir J. 2006 Dec;15(6):337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.08.010. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
10
Cardiovascular prevention in the Hartslag Limburg project: effects of a high-risk approach on behavioral risk factors in a general practice population.哈特斯拉格林堡项目中的心血管疾病预防:高风险干预方法对普通全科医疗人群行为风险因素的影响。
Prev Med. 2006 Nov;43(5):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Aug 14.