计算机辅助提高亲密伴侣暴力幸存者的安全决策过程。
Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence.
机构信息
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
出版信息
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Nov;25(11):1947-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354508. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
Abstract
A computerized safety decision aid was developed and tested with Spanish or English-speaking abused women in shelters or domestic violence (DV) support groups (n = 90). The decision aid provides feedback about risk for lethal violence, options for safety, assistance with setting priorities for safety, and a safety plan personalized to the user. Women reported that the decision aid was useful and provided much-needed privacy for making safety decisions. The majority (69%) reported severe to extreme danger in their relationship as scored by Danger Assessment (DA); only 60% reported having made a safety plan. After using the safety decision aid, the women felt more supported in their decision (p = .012) and had less total decisional conflict (p = .014). The study demonstrated that a computerized safety decision aid improved the safety planning process, as demonstrated by reduced decisional conflict after only one use in a sample of abused women.
摘要
开发并测试了一款计算机化安全决策辅助工具，供庇护所或家庭暴力（DV）支持团体中的西班牙语或英语母语受虐妇女使用（n = 90）。该决策辅助工具提供了关于致命暴力风险、安全选项、安全优先级设置协助以及针对用户个人的安全计划的反馈。妇女们表示，该决策辅助工具很有用，为做出安全决策提供了急需的隐私。大多数（69%）女性在关系中报告了严重到极端的危险，按照危险评估（DA）评分；只有 60%的女性报告制定了安全计划。使用安全决策辅助工具后，女性感到在决策中得到了更多支持（p =.012），并且总决策冲突减少（p =.014）。该研究表明，计算机化安全决策辅助工具改善了安全规划过程，仅在滥用妇女样本中使用一次后，决策冲突就减少了。
相似文献
1
Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Nov;25(11):1947-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260509354508. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
2
The Longitudinal Impact of an Internet Safety Decision Aid for Abused Women.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):606-615. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Use of online safety decision aid by abused women: effect on decisional conflict in a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):372-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
4
A web-based intervention for abused women: the New Zealand isafe randomised controlled trial protocol.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:56. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1395-0.
5
A safety app to respond to dating violence for college women and their friends: the MyPlan study randomized controlled trial protocol.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 8;15:871. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2191-6.
6
Efficacy of a Web-Based Safety Decision Aid for Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 10;19(12):e426. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8617.
7
A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 29;6(6):CD013135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013135.pub2.
8
Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 3;2015(12):CD005043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005043.pub3.
9
Concerned friends of intimate partner violence survivors: results from the myPlan randomized controlled trial on college campuses.
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 31;23(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15918-y.
10
Feasibility of an online safety planning intervention for rural and urban pregnant abused women.
Nurs Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;63(4):243-51. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000036.
引用本文的文献
1
Interventions to prevent violence against women and girls globally: a global systematic review of reviews to update the RESPECT women framework.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 20;3(1):e001126. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001126. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Things Latinas need to plan for safety: A dual-site concept mapping study.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0314371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314371. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital self-help for people experiencing intimate partner violence: a qualitative study on user experiences and needs including people with lived experiences and services providers.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):1471. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16357-5.
4
A Trauma-Informed HIV Intervention (LinkPositively) to Improve HIV Care Among Black Women Affected by Interpersonal Violence: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 5;12:e46325. doi: 10.2196/46325.
5
Concerned friends of intimate partner violence survivors: results from the myPlan randomized controlled trial on college campuses.
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 31;23(1):1033. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15918-y.
6
Computer-based intervention for residents of domestic violence shelters with substance use: A randomized pilot study.
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0285560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285560. eCollection 2023.
7
PROTOCOL: Technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 14;17(1):e1132. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1132. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Natural language model for automatic identification of Intimate Partner Violence reports from Twitter.
Array (N Y). 2022 Sep;15. doi: 10.1016/j.array.2022.100217. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
9
Technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 27;18(3):e1271. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1271. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Applying Telemental Health Services for Adults Experiencing Trafficking.
Public Health Rep. 2022 Jul-Aug;137(1_suppl):17S-22S. doi: 10.1177/00333549221085243.
本文引用的文献
1
Patients were more consistent in randomized trial at prioritizing childbirth preferences using graphic-numeric than verbal formats.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):415-424.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
2
The danger assessment: validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide.
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Apr;24(4):653-74. doi: 10.1177/0886260508317180. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
3
Risk for reassault in abusive female same-sex relationships.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jun;98(6):1021-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.117770. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
4
Complexity of women's response to violence: response to Briere and Jordan.
J Interpers Violence. 2004 Nov;19(11):1277-82. doi: 10.1177/0886260504269683.
5
Increasing the safety-promoting behaviors of abused women.
Am J Nurs. 2004 Mar;104(3):40-50; quiz 50-1. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200403000-00019.
6
A critical pathway for intimate partner violence across the continuum of care.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Sep-Oct;32(5):594-603. doi: 10.1177/0884217503256943.
7
Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences.
Arch Intern Med. 2002 May 27;162(10):1157-63. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.10.1157.
8
The domestic violence survivor assessment: a tool for counseling women in intimate partner violence relationships.
Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Mar;46(3):221-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00216-6.
9
Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1997 Jun;20(2):353-74. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70317-8.
10
Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
Zotero 插件