Bhopal R S, Fallon R J, Buist E C, Black R J, Urquhart J D
Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
BMJ. 1991 Feb 16;302(6773):378-83. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6773.378.
To study the source of non-outbreak legionnaires' disease, particularly the role of cooling towers, by comparing the locations of patients' homes in relation to the location of cooling towers.
Retrospective, descriptive study of a case series of patients with legionnaires' disease ill between 1978 and 1986 and, for comparison, a case series of patients with lung cancer. A prospectively developed register and interview based survey provided data on the location of cooling towers.
The city of Glasgow.
134 patients aged 14-84 with legionnaires' disease during 1978-86 and 10,159 patients with lung cancer during the same period.
The locations of patients' homes and cooling towers as defined by postcodes, which provided map grid references accurate to 10 m; numbers of expected and observed cases of legionnaires' disease in census enumeration districts; and distance of enumeration districts from the nearest cooling tower as defined by five distance categories.
Most cooling towers were in or near the city centre or close to the River Clyde, as were the places of residence of patients with community acquired, non-travel, non-outbreak legionnaires' disease (n = 107). There was an inverse association between the distance of residence from any cooling tower and the risk of infection, the population living within 0.5 km of any tower having a relative risk of infection over three times that of people living more than 1 km away. There was no such association with respect to travel related legionnaires' disease, and for lung cancer the association was weak (relative risk less than or equal to 1.2 in any distance group).
In Glasgow cooling towers have been a source of infection in two outbreaks of legionnaires' disease and, apparently, a source of non-outbreak infection also. Better maintenance of cooling towers should help prevent non-outbreak cases. This method of inquiry should be applied elsewhere to study the source of this and other environmentally acquired disease.
通过比较军团病患者家庭住址与冷却塔位置的关系,研究非暴发型军团病的感染源,尤其是冷却塔的作用。
对1978年至1986年间患军团病的一系列病例进行回顾性描述性研究,并与肺癌患者病例系列作比较。通过前瞻性建立的登记册和基于访谈的调查获取冷却塔位置的数据。
格拉斯哥市。
1978 - 1986年间134例年龄在14 - 84岁的军团病患者,以及同期10159例肺癌患者。
患者家庭住址和冷却塔的位置(由邮政编码确定,可提供精确到10米的地图网格参考);人口普查枚举区中军团病的预期病例数和观察病例数;以及根据五个距离类别定义的枚举区到最近冷却塔的距离。
大多数冷却塔位于市中心或附近,或靠近克莱德河,社区获得性、非旅行、非暴发型军团病患者(n = 107)的居住地点也如此。居住地点到任何冷却塔的距离与感染风险呈负相关,居住在任何冷却塔0.5公里范围内的人群感染相对风险是居住在1公里以外人群的三倍多。旅行相关军团病不存在这种关联,肺癌方面的关联较弱(任何距离组的相对风险小于或等于1.2)。
在格拉斯哥,冷却塔是两次军团病暴发的感染源,显然也是非暴发感染的来源。更好地维护冷却塔应有助于预防非暴发病例。这种调查方法应应用于其他地方,以研究这种及其他环境获得性疾病的感染源。