Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):85-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c46429.
There are differences in conflicts of interest (COIs) in professional organizations compared with academic medical centers. The authors discuss nine major questions pertaining to industry relationships of professional organizations: (1) What makes COI management different in professional membership organizations? (2) What COI challenges are specific to professional organizations? (3) What are potential impacts of perceived or real COIs involving professional organizations and the management of COIs? (4) Is regulation necessary, or should professional organizations proactively resolve COI issues independently? (5) Are guidelines portable from academic medical centers to professional organizations? (6) What approaches may be considered for managing COIs of the organization's leaders? (7) What approaches are reasonable for managing COI issues at professional meetings? (8) What approaches are important for integrity of educational programs, publications, and products? and (9) What approaches are reasonable for managing and enforcing COI guidelines on an ongoing basis? Responses to these questions focus on four principles: First, a code of ethics governing general behavior of members and safeguarding the interest of patients must be in place; second, the monitoring and management of COI for leadership, including, in some cases, recusal from certain activities; third, the pooling and consistent, transparent management of unrestricted grants from corporate sponsors; and, fourth, the management of industry marketing efforts at membership meetings to ensure their appropriateness. The perspectives offered are intended to encourage individuals and learned bodies to further study and provide commentary and recommendations on managing COIs of a professional organization.
专业组织与学术医学中心相比,其利益冲突(COI)存在差异。作者讨论了与专业组织的行业关系相关的九个主要问题:(1)专业会员制组织的 COI 管理有何不同?(2)专业组织特有的 COI 挑战有哪些?(3)涉及专业组织和 COI 管理的潜在利益冲突的感知或实际影响是什么?(4)是否需要监管,或者专业组织是否应主动独立解决 COI 问题?(5)学术医学中心的指南是否可适用于专业组织?(6)可以考虑哪些方法来管理组织领导的 COI?(7)管理专业会议 COI 问题的合理方法有哪些?(8)对于教育计划、出版物和产品的诚信,哪些方法是重要的?(9)管理和执行 COI 准则的合理方法有哪些?这些问题的回答侧重于四项原则:首先,必须制定一套道德准则,规范成员的一般行为,保护患者的利益;其次,必须对领导层的 COI 进行监测和管理,包括在某些情况下回避某些活动;第三,必须汇集和统一管理企业赞助商的无限制赠款,并保持透明;最后,必须管理会员会议上的行业营销工作,以确保其适当性。本文提供的观点旨在鼓励个人和学术团体进一步研究和评论,并就专业组织的 COI 管理提出建议。