Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, LW 703, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Urban Health. 2010 Mar;87(2):236-243. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9420-1. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
The primary aim of this paper was to explore whether provider's understanding of patient's social context is associated with screening uptake, independent of provider's recommendation. Baseline data were collected in 2004-2005 from a cluster randomized control trial in 12 low-income housing sites. Participants included 695 low-income, multiethnic adults aged 50 years and over who were primarily insured (97%). Provider's recommendation was significantly associated with current adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Provider's understanding of patient's social context, as operationalized by how well participants felt that their provider knew (a) their responsibilities at work, home, or school; (b) their worries about health; and (c) them as a person and their values and beliefs, was also significantly associated with current adherence to screening, independent of provider's recommendation. Participants who reported that their provider knew them well on two or three items were significantly more likely to be current with CRC screening compared to those who reported their provider knew them well on only one or none of the items (odds ratio = 1.56; 95% confidence interval = 1.06, 2.29). Our findings indicate that provider's understanding of patient's social context, independent of provider's recommendation for CRC screening, contributed to adherence to CRC screening in this low-income, multiethnic population.
本文的主要目的是探讨提供者对患者社会背景的理解是否与筛查参与度相关,而不考虑提供者的建议。基线数据于 2004-2005 年从 12 个低收入住房点的一项集群随机对照试验中收集。参与者包括 695 名年龄在 50 岁及以上的低收入、多种族成年人,他们主要有保险(97%)。提供者的建议与结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的当前依从性显著相关。提供者对患者社会背景的理解,通过参与者认为他们的提供者对以下方面的了解程度来衡量:(a)他们在工作、家庭或学校的责任;(b)他们对健康的担忧;以及(c)他们作为一个人和他们的价值观和信仰,与筛查的当前依从性也显著相关,而不考虑提供者的建议。与报告提供者仅了解他们的一个或没有一个项目的参与者相比,报告提供者在两个或三个项目上了解他们的参与者更有可能接受 CRC 筛查(比值比=1.56;95%置信区间=1.06,2.29)。我们的研究结果表明,提供者对患者社会背景的理解,独立于 CRC 筛查的提供者建议,有助于在这个低收入、多种族人群中提高 CRC 筛查的依从性。