Department of Family and Community Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 6263 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9067, USA.
J Community Health. 2010 Dec;35(6):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9247-4.
The objective of this review was to summarize the current literature of community-based colorectal cancer screening randomized controlled trials with multi-ethnic groups. The CDC reports 40% of adults do not receive time-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. Although overall screening rates have improved since 2000, disparities remain. Studies examining community characteristics may offer insight into improving screening rates and eliminating disparities. We identified community-based colorectal cancer screening studies using PubMed and Ovid Medline database searches. Inclusion criteria were: community-based, randomized controlled trials; English language; published from 1/2001 to 8/2009; all colorectal cancer screening test interventions recommended in the 2008 "Joint Consensus" report; and study participants from at least two racial/ethnic groups, with not more than 90% representation from one group. There were 29 relevant articles published during 2001-2009; with 15 meeting inclusion criteria. We categorized the final studies (n = 15) into the four categories of Patient mailings (n = 3), Telephone outreach (n = 3), Electronic/multimedia (n = 4), and Counseling/community education (n = 5). Of 15 studies, 11 (73%) demonstrated increased screening rates for the intervention group compared to controls, including all studies (100%) from the Patient mailings and Telephone outreach groups, 4 of 5 (80%) Counseling/community education studies, and 1 of 4 (25%) Electronic/multimedia interventions. Patient choice and tailoring of information were common features of trials that increased screening rates across study categories. Including community-level factors and social context may be useful in future design and evaluation of colorectal cancer interventions to reduce or prevent new cases of colorectal cancer.
本研究旨在综述多民族人群的社区为基础的结直肠癌筛查随机对照试验的现有文献。疾病预防控制中心报告称,有 40%的成年人未接受适当时间的结直肠癌筛查。尽管自 2000 年以来总体筛查率有所提高,但差距仍然存在。研究社区特征的研究可能有助于提高筛查率和消除差距。我们使用 PubMed 和 Ovid Medline 数据库搜索来确定社区为基础的结直肠癌筛查研究。纳入标准为:以社区为基础的、随机对照试验;英语语言;发表时间为 2001 年 1 月至 2009 年 8 月;2008 年“联合共识”报告中推荐的所有结直肠癌筛查试验干预措施;以及研究参与者来自至少两个种族/族裔群体,来自一个群体的比例不超过 90%。2001 年至 2009 年期间发表了 29 篇相关文章,其中 15 篇符合纳入标准。我们将最终的研究(n = 15)分为以下四类:患者邮件(n = 3)、电话外展(n = 3)、电子/多媒体(n = 4)和咨询/社区教育(n = 5)。在 15 项研究中,有 11 项(73%)干预组的筛查率高于对照组,包括来自患者邮件和电话外展组的所有研究(100%)、咨询/社区教育研究的 4 项(80%)和电子/多媒体干预的 1 项(25%)。患者选择和信息定制是提高各研究类别筛查率的常见特征。纳入社区层面的因素和社会背景可能有助于未来设计和评估结直肠癌干预措施,以减少或预防结直肠癌新病例的发生。