• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订后的FLACC观察性疼痛工具:提高了对认知障碍儿童疼痛评估的可靠性和有效性。

The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Malviya Shobha, Voepel-Lewis Terri, Burke Constance, Merkel Sandra, Tait Alan R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Section of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0211, USA.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Mar;16(3):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x
PMID:16490089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Difficulty with pain assessment in individuals who cannot self-report their pain poses a significant barrier to effective pain management. However, available assessment tools lack consistent reliability as pain measures in children with cognitive impairment (CI). This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the revised and individualized Face Legs Activity Cry and Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain assessment tool in children with CI.

METHODS

Children with CI scheduled for elective surgery were studied. The FLACC was revised to include specific descriptors and parent-identified, unique behaviors for individual children. The child's ability to self-report pain was evaluated. Postoperatively, two nurses scored pain using the revised FLACC scale before and after analgesic administration, and, children self-reported a pain score, if able. Observations were videotaped and later viewed by experienced nurses blinded to analgesic administration.

RESULTS

Eighty observations were recorded in 52 children aged 4-19 years. Twenty-one parents added individualized pain behaviors to the revised FLACC. Interrater reliability was supported by excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, ranging from 0.76 to 0.90) and adequate kappa statistics (0.44-0.57). Criterion validity was supported by the correlations between FLACC, parent, and child scores (rho = 0.65-0.87; P < 0.001). Construct validity was demonstrated by the decrease in FLACC scores following analgesic administration (6.1 +/- 2.6 vs 1.9 +/- 2.7; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the reliability and validity of the FLACC as a measure of pain in children with CI.

摘要

背景

对于无法自我报告疼痛的个体,疼痛评估存在困难,这对有效的疼痛管理构成了重大障碍。然而,现有的评估工具在认知障碍(CI)儿童中作为疼痛测量方法缺乏一致的可靠性。本研究评估了修订后的个性化面部、腿部、活动、哭闹及可安慰性(FLACC)行为疼痛评估工具在CI儿童中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

对计划进行择期手术的CI儿童进行研究。对FLACC进行了修订,纳入了特定描述以及家长确定的每个儿童独特的行为。评估了儿童自我报告疼痛的能力。术后,两名护士在给予镇痛药前后使用修订后的FLACC量表对疼痛进行评分,若儿童能够自我报告,则让其报告疼痛评分。观察过程进行录像,之后由对镇痛药使用情况不知情的经验丰富的护士观看。

结果

对52名4至19岁儿童进行了80次观察。21名家长为修订后的FLACC添加了个性化疼痛行为。组内相关系数(ICC,范围为0.76至0.90)良好以及kappa统计量充足(0.44 - 0.57)支持了评分者间信度。FLACC、家长和儿童评分之间的相关性(rho = 0.65 - 0.87;P < 0.001)支持了效标效度。镇痛药给药后FLACC评分降低(6.1 ± 2.6对1.9 ± 2.7;P < 0.001)证明了结构效度。

结论

研究结果支持FLACC作为CI儿童疼痛测量方法的可靠性和有效性。

相似文献

1
The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.修订后的FLACC观察性疼痛工具:提高了对认知障碍儿童疼痛评估的可靠性和有效性。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Mar;16(3):258-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01773.x.
2
The reliability and validity of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability observational tool as a measure of pain in children with cognitive impairment.面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安抚性观察工具作为评估认知障碍儿童疼痛程度的可靠性和有效性。
Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1224-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200211000-00020.
3
Validity of parent ratings as proxy measures of pain in children with cognitive impairment.家长评分作为认知障碍儿童疼痛替代指标的有效性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2005 Dec;6(4):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2005.08.004.
4
Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.面部、腿部、活动、哭声、可安抚性行为工具评估危重症患者急性疼痛的可靠性和有效性。
Am J Crit Care. 2010 Jan;19(1):55-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2010624.
5
The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.用于5至16岁儿童程序性疼痛评估的FLACC行为量表。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Aug;18(8):767-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02655.x.
6
A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.认知障碍儿童疼痛评估工具的临床效用比较。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):72-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287680.21212.d0.
7
The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中的COMFORT行为量表和改良的FLACC量表。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00323.x.
8
Self-report of pain in young people and adults with spastic cerebral palsy: interrater reliability of the revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (r-FLACC) scale ratings.痉挛型脑瘫青少年和成人的自我报告疼痛:修订后的面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰(r-FLACC)量表评分的评定者间信度。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Jan;61(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13980. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
9
Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.验证面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安抚(FLACC)行为量表日文版的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194094. eCollection 2018.
10
Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale.FLACC:非语言患者疼痛量表的临床验证。
Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):140-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain experience and perception in individuals with Snijders Blok-Campeau syndrome.斯奈德氏布洛克-坎波综合征患者的疼痛体验与感知
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 13;6:1540422. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1540422. eCollection 2025.
2
Prevalence, Severity, and Associated Factors of Postoperative Pain among Paediatric Patients Admitted to Paediatric Wards, Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚吉姆马大学医学中心儿科病房收治的儿科患者术后疼痛的患病率、严重程度及相关因素
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2025 May;35(3):171-178. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v35i3.4.
3
The Effect of Limiting Anterior Chest Wall Movement With a Weighted Blanket on Comfort, Oxygenation, and Ventilation Homogeneity in Nonventilated Infants and Children Admitted to Hospital With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: An Exploratory Pilot Study.
使用加重毛毯限制前胸壁运动对因下呼吸道感染入院的未通气婴幼儿舒适度、氧合及通气均匀性的影响:一项探索性初步研究
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 Jul;60(7):e71186. doi: 10.1002/ppul.71186.
4
Unraveling Osteoarthritis: Mechanistic Insights and Emerging Therapies Targeting Pain and Inflammation.解析骨关节炎:针对疼痛与炎症的机制见解及新兴疗法
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 16;15(6):874. doi: 10.3390/biom15060874.
5
The Effectiveness of Bubble-Blowing as a Distraction Technique During Pediatric Intravenous Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.吹泡泡作为小儿静脉置管时的一种分散注意力技术的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Aug;35(8):635-642. doi: 10.1111/pan.15138. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
6
Improving Postoperative Pediatric Recovery by Efficient Recovery Room Care-A Comprehensive Review.通过高效的恢复室护理改善小儿术后恢复——一项综述
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;12(5):568. doi: 10.3390/children12050568.
7
Cerebral Palsy in a Rural Desert Population of Southern Algeria: A Cross-Sectional Study of Epidemiology of Comorbidities and Unmet Needs.阿尔及利亚南部农村沙漠地区的脑瘫:合并症和未满足需求的流行病学横断面研究
J Child Neurol. 2025 Oct;40(9):757-766. doi: 10.1177/08830738251336486. Epub 2025 May 8.
8
Validity and reliability of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for critically ill pediatric patients.危重症儿童患者使用的重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 18;20(4):e0320373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320373. eCollection 2025.
9
Evaluation of Pain in the Pediatric Patient Admitted to Sub-Intensive Care: What Is the Evidence? A Scoping Review.入住亚重症监护病房的儿科患者疼痛评估:证据有哪些?一项范围综述。
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;6(1):9. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia6010009.
10
A Retrospective Analysis of Superficial Cervical Plexus Blockade for Children Undergoing Otologic Surgery.小儿耳科手术中颈浅丛阻滞的回顾性分析
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2025 Feb 14;7(1):e70002. doi: 10.1002/pne2.70002. eCollection 2025 Mar.