Schomacher Jochen
Freelance Instructor of Physiotherapy, Küsnacht, ZH.
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(2):101-8. doi: 10.1179/106698109790824758.
The purpose of this single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of a manual treatment technique on neck pain and movement sensation when applied in different segments of the cervical spine. Consecutive patients with neck pain (n=126) were recruited and randomly allocated to two groups (A or B). Group A received a single 4-minute pain-alleviating traction at the most symptomatic zygopophyseal joint of the cervical segment, where movement was correlated with pain. Group B received the same treatment 3 segments away from the concordant segment. Pain intensity and sensation of movement were assessed with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Statistical analysis included a t-test for paired and unpaired samples. Pre- and post-test findings demonstrated significant improvements in both types of mobilization although there was no significant difference between the two groups. Similar results have been reported in the literature for cervical manipulation. The findings of this study question the necessity of precise symptom localization tests for a pain treatment. however, limitations of the study prevent generalization of these results.
这项单盲随机对照试验的目的是比较一种手法治疗技术应用于颈椎不同节段时对颈部疼痛和运动感觉的影响。连续招募了126例颈部疼痛患者,并随机分为两组(A组或B组)。A组在颈椎节段最有症状的关节突关节接受单次4分钟的缓解疼痛牵引,该节段的运动与疼痛相关。B组在与一致节段相距3个节段处接受相同治疗。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛强度和运动感觉。统计分析包括配对和非配对样本的t检验。测试前和测试后的结果表明,两种类型的松动治疗均有显著改善,尽管两组之间没有显著差异。文献中关于颈椎手法治疗也报道了类似结果。本研究结果对疼痛治疗中精确症状定位测试的必要性提出了质疑。然而,本研究的局限性妨碍了这些结果的推广。