Paatelma Markku, Karvonen Eira, Heiskanen Jouko
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(1):11-9. doi: 10.1179/106698109790818197.
Our limited understanding of underlying conditions for back pain is reflected in the common use of pain-duration-based groupings. The aim of this paper was to investigate typical clinical tests used in examining low back pain (LBP) patients in order to discover how tests distinguish between chronic low back pain patients (CLBP) and subacute low back pain patients (SLBP) and if they distinguish these groups from those with no "patient status." CLBP patients in this study were from a university hospital and SLBP patients were from five occupational health care centers. Control subjects were recruited from a university. Determination of the best predictors between CLBP and SLBP patients and between CLBP and SLBP patients and non-patients was made by a forward stepwise logistic model. A total of 157 subjects were included in the study. Of all the clinical tests, several tests in each category had high odds ratio, differentiating CLBP patients from controls. Only a few tests differentiated between CLBP and SLBP patients. The only clinical differences between SLBP patients and controls were in the mobility test and in one test of muscle tightness. The best predictor for CLBP was the lumbar spine flexion test. SLBP patients seemed to differ from the control group in lumbar flexion, in a specific anterior-posterior mobility test, and in tightness of hip flexor muscles. CLBP patients differed from SLBP patients in functional tests, in the presence of sensation in the feet, and in different pain provocation tests. Whether these tests are sufficiently sensitive to classify a more specific diagnostic or clinical subgroup remains untested, and further studies with clinical tests to differentiate among pathological conditions are necessary.
我们对背痛潜在病因的有限理解反映在基于疼痛持续时间的分组的普遍使用上。本文的目的是调查用于检查下背痛(LBP)患者的典型临床测试,以发现这些测试如何区分慢性下背痛患者(CLBP)和亚急性下背痛患者(SLBP),以及它们是否能将这些组与无“患者状态”的组区分开来。本研究中的CLBP患者来自一家大学医院,SLBP患者来自五个职业健康护理中心。对照受试者从一所大学招募。通过向前逐步逻辑模型确定CLBP与SLBP患者之间以及CLBP与SLBP患者和非患者之间的最佳预测指标。共有157名受试者纳入研究。在所有临床测试中,每个类别中的几项测试具有高比值比,可将CLBP患者与对照组区分开来。只有少数测试能区分CLBP和SLBP患者。SLBP患者与对照组之间唯一的临床差异在于活动度测试和一项肌肉紧张度测试。CLBP的最佳预测指标是腰椎前屈测试。SLBP患者在腰椎前屈、一项特定的前后活动度测试以及髋部屈肌紧张度方面似乎与对照组不同。CLBP患者在功能测试、足部感觉的存在以及不同的疼痛激发测试方面与SLBP患者不同。这些测试是否足够敏感以对更具体的诊断或临床亚组进行分类仍未得到检验,因此有必要进一步开展临床测试研究以区分不同的病理状况。