Suppr超能文献

老年人知道其配偶的临终治疗偏好吗?

Do Older Adults Know Their Spouses' End-of-Life Treatment Preferences?

作者信息

Moorman Sara M, Hauser Robert M, Carr Deborah

出版信息

Res Aging. 2009;31(4):463-491. doi: 10.1177/0164027509333683.

Abstract

When terminally ill patients become mentally incapacitated, the patient's surrogate often makes treatment decisions in collaboration with health care providers. We examine how surrogates' errors in reporting their spouse's preferences are affected by their gender, status as durable power of attorney for health care (DPAHC), whether the surrogate and spouse held discussions about end-of-life preferences, and the spouse's health status. We apply structural equation models to data from 2,750 married couples in their mid 60s who participated in the 2004 wave of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study. Surrogates reported their spouse's preferences incorrectly 13 and 26 percent of the time in end-of-life scenarios involving cognitive impairment and physical pain, respectively. Surrogates projected their own preferences onto the spouse. Similar patterns emerged regardless of surrogate gender, surrogate status as DPAHC, marital discussions about end-of-life, or spousal health status. We discuss implications for the process of surrogate decision-making and for future research.

摘要

当绝症患者出现精神上无行为能力的情况时,患者的代理人通常会与医疗服务提供者合作做出治疗决策。我们研究了代理人在报告其配偶的偏好时所犯的错误是如何受到其性别、作为医疗保健持久授权书(DPAHC)的身份、代理人与配偶是否就临终偏好进行过讨论以及配偶的健康状况影响的。我们将结构方程模型应用于来自2750对65岁左右已婚夫妇的数据,这些夫妇参与了2004年的威斯康星纵向研究。在涉及认知障碍和身体疼痛的临终场景中,代理人分别有13%和26%的时间错误地报告了其配偶的偏好。代理人将自己的偏好投射到了配偶身上。无论代理人的性别、作为DPAHC的身份、关于临终的婚姻讨论或配偶的健康状况如何,都出现了类似的模式。我们讨论了对代理人决策过程以及未来研究的影响。

相似文献

1
Do Older Adults Know Their Spouses' End-of-Life Treatment Preferences?
Res Aging. 2009;31(4):463-491. doi: 10.1177/0164027509333683.
3
Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: can surrogates accurately predict patients' preferences?
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):524-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315244. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
4
Advance Directive Completion Among Older American Couples: A Dyadic Perspective on the Role of Cognitive Function and Other Factors.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jun 1;77(6):1144-1153. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab077.
5
Honey, Do I Look Fat? Perceptions of Spouses' Weight and Weight Concerns Predict Marital Relationship Quality.
J Soc Pers Relat. 2020 Mar;37(3):865-884. doi: 10.1177/0265407519880961. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
6
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
7
Depression and marital dissatisfaction in patients with end-stage renal disease and in their spouses.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Oct;38(4):839-46. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.27704.
8
The Importance of Feeling Understood in Marital Conversations about End-of-Life Health Care.
J Soc Pers Relat. 2011 Feb 1;28(1):100-116. doi: 10.1177/0265407510386137.
9
Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
Arch Fam Med. 1995 Jun;4(6):518-23. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.6.518.
10
The Impact of Spouse's Illness on Depressive Symptoms: The Roles of Spousal Caregiving and Marital Satisfaction.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Aug 13;75(7):1548-1557. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz017.

引用本文的文献

1
"I Wish I Knew": Assessing Older Adults' Perceived and Actual Knowledge of Their Partners' End-of-Life Preferences.
Innov Aging. 2025 Apr 24;9(6):igaf038. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf038. eCollection 2025.
2
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
3
Disparities and determinants of place of death: Insights from the Utah Population Database.
Death Stud. 2024;48(7):663-675. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2255864. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Projection of Care Partners' Preferences in the Proxy Assessments of Everyday Preferences for Persons With Cognitive Impairment.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;31(4):254-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.12.005. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
5
How Dutch neurologists involve families of critically ill patients in end-of-life care and decision-making.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;5(1):50-57. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000091.
6
Planning for Future Care and the End of Life: A Qualitative Analysis of Gay, Lesbian, and Heterosexual Couples.
J Health Soc Behav. 2017 Dec;58(4):473-487. doi: 10.1177/0022146517735524. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
7
[Existential questions prior to elective surgery. Survey in a preoperative anesthesia consultation service].
Anaesthesist. 2016 Apr;65(4):258-66. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0153-8. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
Surrogate utility estimation by long-term partners and unfamiliar dyads.
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 25;6:315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00315. eCollection 2015.
9
A manifesto on the preservation of sexual function in women and girls with cancer.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;213(2):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
10
Discussing goals of care for a delirious advanced cancer patient in the hospice setting.
J Palliat Med. 2013 Oct;16(10):1313-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0366. Epub 2013 May 1.

本文引用的文献

4
Growing less empathic with age: disinhibition of the self-perspective.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 Jul;63(4):P219-P226. doi: 10.1093/geronb/63.4.p219.
5
Health care proxies: whom do young old adults choose and why?
J Health Soc Behav. 2007 Jun;48(2):180-94. doi: 10.1177/002214650704800206.
6
The default effect in end-of-life medical treatment preferences.
Med Decis Making. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):299-310. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07300608.
7
End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: an assessment of psychosocial influences.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):S135-41. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.s135.
8
Changes in preferences for life-sustaining treatment among older persons with advanced illness.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0104-9.
9
Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x.
10
Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Aug-Sep;23(4):277-86. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290380.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验