• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走向安宁:对善终概念的剖析

Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death.

作者信息

Kehl Karen A

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Hospice Care Inc, Madison, Wisconsi, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Aug-Sep;23(4):277-86. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290380.

DOI:10.1177/1049909106290380
PMID:17060291
Abstract

One of the primary outcomes of end-of-life care should be the experience of a good death by the patient and the family. Yet there is no clear, shared understanding of what a good death is. This analysis of the concept of a good death has been guided by Rodgers' evolutionary method of concept analysis.(1) Forty-two articles were analyzed. There was the strong agreement that the concept of a good death was highly individual, changeable over time, and based on perspective and experience. Medical, nursing, and patient perspectives, as well as literature in sociology, include the following attributes of a good death, listed in order of frequency of appearance in the literature: being in control, being comfortable, sense of closure, affirmation/value of the dying person recognized, trust in care providers, recognition of impending death, beliefs and values honored, burden minimized, relationships optimized, appropriateness of death, leaving a legacy, and family care.

摘要

临终关怀的主要成果之一应该是让患者及其家人体验安详离世。然而,对于什么是安详离世,并没有清晰、一致的理解。对安详离世概念的这一分析是受罗杰斯概念分析的进化方法指导的。(1)对42篇文章进行了分析。人们强烈认同,安详离世的概念高度因人而异,随时间变化,且基于个人观点和经历。医学、护理和患者的观点,以及社会学文献,都包含了安详离世的以下属性,按照在文献中出现的频率依次列出:掌控局面、感到舒适、有结束感、临终者的价值得到肯定/认可、对护理人员的信任、意识到临近死亡、信仰和价值观得到尊重、负担最小化、人际关系优化、死亡的适宜性、留下遗产以及家人关怀。

相似文献

1
Moving toward peace: an analysis of the concept of a good death.走向安宁:对善终概念的剖析
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Aug-Sep;23(4):277-86. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290380.
2
Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making.荷兰普通公众对善终的偏好以及与临终决策态度的关联。
Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;20(7):685-92. doi: 10.1177/0269216306070241.
3
Good death in Japanese cancer care: a qualitative study.日本癌症护理中的善终:一项定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Feb;31(2):140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.012.
4
A concept analysis of palliative care in the United States.美国姑息治疗的概念分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Apr;46(2):152-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2003.02975.x.
5
What constitutes a dignified death? The voice of oncology advanced practice nurses.何为尊严死?肿瘤高级执业护士的声音。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):241-7; quiz 248-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NUR.0000289749.77866.7c.
6
The Japan HOspice and Palliative Care Evaluation Study (J-HOPE Study): views about legalization of death with dignity and euthanasia among the bereaved whose family member died at palliative care units.日本临终关怀与姑息治疗评估研究(J-HOPE研究):对在姑息治疗病房去世的家庭成员的遗属中尊严死和安乐死合法化的看法。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Apr-May;26(2):98-104. doi: 10.1177/1049909108327027.
7
The experiences of Chinese family members of terminally ill patients - a qualitative study.晚期绝症患者中国家庭成员的经历——一项定性研究
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01943.x.
8
Meaninglessness in terminally ill cancer patients: a validation study and nurse education intervention trial.晚期癌症患者的无意义感:一项验证性研究及护士教育干预试验
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Aug;34(2):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.021. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
9
Hospice care in the United States.美国的临终关怀服务。
Prim Care. 2011 Jun;38(2):173-82, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2011.03.002.
10
Integrating palliative care: a postmodern perspective.整合姑息治疗:后现代视角
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006 Aug-Sep;23(4):255-8. doi: 10.1177/1049909106290242.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural assumptions and the good death: rethinking global frameworks.文化假设与善终:重新思考全球框架
Med Humanit. 2025 May 27;51(2):296-300. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013062.
2
Delirium prevention in hospices: Opportunities and limitations - A focused ethnography.临终关怀机构中的谵妄预防:机遇与局限——一项聚焦人种志研究
Palliat Med. 2025 Mar;39(3):391-400. doi: 10.1177/02692163241310762. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
Further Psychometric Evaluation of the Eight-Item Hospice Philosophy Scale: Results From a National Sample of Interdisciplinary Hospice Clinicians.
八项临终关怀理念量表的进一步心理测量评估:来自全国跨学科临终关怀临床医生样本的结果
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):70-82. doi: 10.1177/07334648241265183. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
End-of-Life Care Planning: Perspectives of Returning Citizens.末期医疗照护规划:回归公民的观点。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2024 Apr 1;26(2):82-90. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000999. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
5
Characterizing end-of-life communication in families.描述家庭中的临终沟通。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Sep 4;17:26323524231193033. doi: 10.1177/26323524231193033. eCollection 2023.
6
Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking in the age of medical assistance in dying: ethical considerations for physicians.在医疗协助死亡时代的自愿停止进食和饮水:医生的伦理考量
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Jul 25;16:26323524221112170. doi: 10.1177/26323524221112170. eCollection 2022.
7
Exploring the End-of-Life Experiences of Advanced Cancer Patients from India.探索印度晚期癌症患者的临终体验。
Health Psychol Res. 2022 Jun 28;10(3):36272. doi: 10.52965/001c.36272. eCollection 2022.
8
Leaving a lasting legacy: A scoping review of ethical wills.留下持久的遗产:遗嘱的范围审查。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Feb;21(1):127-145. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522000451.
9
Exploring Web-Based Twitter Conversations Surrounding National Healthcare Decisions Day and Advance Care Planning From a Sociocultural Perspective: Computational Mixed Methods Analysis.从社会文化视角探索围绕国家医疗决策日及预先医疗护理规划的基于网络的推特对话:计算混合方法分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 13;6(4):e35795. doi: 10.2196/35795.
10
Visitor Restrictions, Palliative Care, and Epistemic Agency: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Relational Practice During the Coronavirus Pandemic.访客限制、姑息治疗与认知能动性:关于新冠疫情期间护士关系实践的定性研究
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 Nov 3;8:23333936211051702. doi: 10.1177/23333936211051702. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.