Suppr超能文献

两种不同美沙拉嗪制剂诱导溃疡性结肠炎缓解的直接比较:一项双盲、随机研究。

Direct comparison of two different mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, randomized study.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center of Excellence, Kitano Hospital, The Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Sep;16(9):1567-74. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21193.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesalamine is the first-line drug for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We directly compared the efficacy and safety of two mesalamine formulations for the induction of remission in patients with UC.

METHODS

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study, 229 patients with mild-to-moderate active UC were assigned to 4 groups: 66 and 65 received a pH-dependent release formulation of 2.4 g/day (pH-2.4 g) or 3.6 g/day (pH-3.6 g), respectively; 65 received a time-dependent release formulation of 2.25 g/day (Time-2.25 g), and 33 received placebo (Placebo). The drugs were administered three times daily for eight weeks. The primary endpoint was a decrease in the UC disease activity index (UC-DAI).

RESULTS

In the full analysis set (n = 225) the decrease in UC-DAI in each group was 1.5 in pH-2.4 g, 2.9 in pH-3.6 g, 1.3 in Time-2.25 g and 0.3 in Placebo, respectively. These results demonstrate the superiority of pH-3.6 g over Time-2.25 g (P = 0.003) and the noninferiority of pH-2.4 g to Time-2.25 g. Among the patients with proctitis-type UC, a significant decrease in UC-DAI was observed in pH-2.4 g and pH-3.6 g as compared to Placebo, but not in Time-2.25 g. No differences were observed in the safety profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher dose of the pH-dependent release formulation was more effective for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active UC. Additionally, the pH-dependent release formulation was preferable to the time-dependent release formulation for patients with proctitis-type UC (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. C000000288).

摘要

背景

美沙拉嗪是治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的一线药物。我们直接比较了两种美沙拉嗪制剂在诱导 UC 缓解方面的疗效和安全性。

方法

在一项多中心、双盲、随机研究中,229 名轻度至中度活动性 UC 患者被分为 4 组:66 名和 65 名分别接受每天 2.4 克(pH-2.4 克)或 3.6 克(pH-3.6 克)的 pH 依赖性释放制剂;65 名接受每天 2.25 克(Time-2.25 g)的时间依赖性释放制剂,33 名接受安慰剂(Placebo)。药物每天分三次给药,共八周。主要终点是 UC 疾病活动指数(UC-DAI)的下降。

结果

在全分析集(n=225)中,每组 UC-DAI 的下降分别为 pH-2.4 g 组 1.5,pH-3.6 g 组 2.9,Time-2.25 g 组 1.3 和 Placebo 组 0.3。这些结果表明 pH-3.6 g 优于 Time-2.25 g(P=0.003),并且 pH-2.4 g 与 Time-2.25 g 相当。在直肠炎型 UC 患者中,与安慰剂相比,pH-2.4 g 和 pH-3.6 g 可显著降低 UC-DAI,但 Time-2.25 g 则不然。安全性特征无差异。

结论

较高剂量的 pH 依赖性释放制剂在诱导轻度至中度活动性 UC 缓解方面更有效。此外,对于直肠炎型 UC 患者,pH 依赖性释放制剂优于时间依赖性释放制剂(UMIN 临床试验注册编号:C000000288)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a04/2972638/a70befda5f8b/ibd0016-1567-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验