Suzuki Yasuo, Iida Mitsuo, Ito Hiroaki, Nishino Haruo, Ohmori Toshihide, Arai Takehiro, Yokoyama Tadashi, Okubo Takanori, Hibi Toshifumi
*Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Japan;†Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan;‡Kinshukai Infusion Clinic, Osaka, Japan;§Matsushima Clinic, Yokohama, Japan;‖Ohmori Toshihide Gastro-Intestinal Clinic, Ageo, Japan;¶Toukatsu Tsujinaka Hospital, Abiko, Japan;**Yokoyama Hospital for Gastroenterological Diseases, Nagoya, Japan. T. Yokoyama is now with theYokoyama IBD Clinic, Nagoya, Japan;††Clinical Research 2, Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; and‡‡Center for Advanced IBD Research and Treatment, Kitasato Institute Hospital, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 May;23(5):822-832. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001065.
The noninferiority of pH-dependent release mesalamine (Asacol) once daily (QD) to 3 times daily (TID) administration was investigated.
This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-control study, with dynamic and stochastic allocation using central registration. Patients with ulcerative colitis in remission (a bloody stool score of 0, and an ulcerative colitis disease activity index of ≤2), received the study drug (Asacol 2.4 g/d) for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint of the nonrecurrence rate was assessed on the full analysis set. The noninferiority margin was 10%.
Six hundred and four subjects were eligible and were allocated; 603 subjects received the study drug. The full analysis set comprised 602 subjects (QD: 301, TID: 301). Nonrecurrence rates were 88.4% in the QD and 89.6% in the TID. The difference between nonrecurrence rates was -1.3% (95% confidence interval: -6.2, 3.7), confirming noninferiority. No differences in the safety profile were observed between the two treatment groups. On post hoc analysis by integrating the QD and the TID, nonrecurrence rate with a mucosal appearance score of 0 at determination of eligibility was significantly higher than the score of 1. The mean compliance rates were 97.7% in the QD and 98.1% in the TID.
QD dosing with Asacol is as effective and safe as TID for maintenance of remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. Additionally, this study indicated that maintaining a good mucosal state is the key for longer maintenance of remission.
研究了每日一次(QD)服用pH依赖型美沙拉嗪(艾迪莎)与每日三次(TID)服用的非劣效性。
这是一项3期、多中心、随机、双盲、平行组、活性对照研究,采用中央注册进行动态随机分配。处于缓解期的溃疡性结肠炎患者(便血评分为0,溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动指数≤2),接受研究药物(艾迪莎2.4 g/d)治疗48周。在全分析集上评估无复发率这一主要疗效终点。非劣效性界值为10%。
604名受试者符合条件并被分配;603名受试者接受了研究药物。全分析集包括602名受试者(QD组:301名,TID组:301名)。QD组的无复发率为88.4%,TID组为89.6%。无复发率之间的差异为-1.3%(95%置信区间:-6.2,3.7),证实了非劣效性。两个治疗组之间在安全性方面未观察到差异。通过整合QD组和TID组进行事后分析,入选时黏膜外观评分为0的无复发率显著高于评分为1的情况。QD组的平均依从率为97.7%,TID组为98.1%。
对于溃疡性结肠炎患者维持缓解,每日一次服用艾迪莎与每日三次服用一样有效且安全。此外,本研究表明维持良好的黏膜状态是更长时间维持缓解的关键。