Suppr超能文献

QD 与 TID 口服美沙拉嗪维持溃疡性结肠炎缓解的比较:一项双盲、双模拟、随机、多中心研究。

Comparison of QD and TID oral mesalazine for maintenance of remission in quiescent ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Jul;19(8):1681-90. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0b013e318286fa3d.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine preparations are widely used to treat mild to moderately severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared once-daily administration of oral mesalazine in patients with quiescent UC with the established 3-times-daily prescription, assessing the efficacy and safety of each method in maintaining remission for 52 weeks.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicenter noninferiority study in which 301 patients with quiescent UC were randomly assigned to treatment groups and administered prolonged-release oral mesalazine at doses of 1.5 to 2.25 g/d once daily (QD) or 3 times daily (TID) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was whether remission was maintained after 52 weeks of administration or until the time of discontinuation, as represented by the Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index score.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients still in remission after 52 weeks of administration was 79.4% in the QD group and 71.6% in the TID group. The between-group difference was 7.8% (2-tailed 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.2% to 17.8%), and the noninferiority of QD administration to TID administration was verified with a noninferiority margin of -10%. In the safety analysis, the incidence of adverse events in each group was 72.4% for the QD group and 76.5% for the TID group, showing no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.4305).

CONCLUSIONS

This double-blind parallel-group comparison verified for the first time the noninferiority of QD administration of oral mesalazine 1.5 to 2.25 g/d to TID administration in terms of maintaining remission in patients with UC.

摘要

背景

美沙拉嗪制剂被广泛用于治疗轻度至中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。我们比较了每日一次口服美沙拉嗪治疗处于缓解期的 UC 患者与既定的每日三次处方的疗效和安全性,评估了两种方法在 52 周内维持缓解的效果。

方法

这是一项双盲、双模拟、随机、多中心非劣效性研究,共纳入 301 例处于缓解期的 UC 患者,随机分配至治疗组,并接受剂量为 1.5 至 2.25 g/d 的缓释口服美沙拉嗪,每日一次(QD)或每日三次(TID),共 52 周。主要终点是通过溃疡性结肠炎疾病活动指数(UC-DAI)评分评估 52 周治疗或直至停药后是否仍维持缓解。

结果

QD 组和 TID 组在 52 周治疗后仍处于缓解的患者比例分别为 79.4%和 71.6%。组间差异为 7.8%(双侧 95%置信区间[CI]:-2.2%至 17.8%),QD 给药非劣效于 TID 给药的非劣效性边界为-10%。在安全性分析中,QD 组和 TID 组的不良事件发生率分别为 72.4%和 76.5%,两组间无统计学差异(P = 0.4305)。

结论

这项双盲平行组比较首次证实,QD 给药 1.5 至 2.25 g/d 与 TID 给药在维持 UC 患者缓解方面等效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验