MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 285, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Diabetologia. 2010 Apr;53(4):624-31. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1641-z. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We sought to determine the effect of an aerobic exercise intervention on clustered metabolic risk and related outcomes in healthy older adults in a single-centre, explanatory randomised controlled trial.
Participants from the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (born 1931-1939) were randomly assigned to 36 supervised 1 h sessions on a cycle ergometer over 12 weeks or to a non-intervention control group. Randomisation and group allocation were conducted by the study co-ordinator, using a software programme. Those with prevalent diabetes, unstable ischaemic heart disease or poor mobility were excluded. All data were collected at our clinical research facility in Cambridge. Components of the metabolic syndrome were used to derive a standardised composite metabolic risk score (zMS) as the primary outcome. Trial status: closed to follow-up.
We randomised 100 participants (50 to the intervention, 50 to the control group). Mean age was 71.4 (range 67.4-76.3) years. Overall, 96% of participants attended for follow-up measures. There were no serious adverse events. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we saw a non-significant reduction in zMS in the exercise group compared with controls (0.07 [95% CI -0.03, 0.17], p = 0.19). However, the exercise group had significantly decreased weight, waist circumference and intrahepatic lipid, with increased aerobic fitness and a 68% reduction in prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.11-0.92], p = 0.035) compared with controls. Results were similar in per-protocol analyses.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Enrolment in a supervised aerobic exercise intervention led to weight loss, increased fitness and improvements in some but not all metabolic outcomes. In appropriately screened older individuals, such interventions appear to be safe.
Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN60986572
Medical Research Council.
目的/假设:我们旨在通过一项单中心、解释性随机对照试验,确定有氧运动干预对健康老年人代谢风险聚集及相关结局的影响。
来自赫特福德郡队列研究(1931-1939 年出生)的参与者被随机分配到 12 周内进行 36 次监督的 1 小时自行车运动,或分到非干预对照组。随机化和分组由研究协调员使用软件程序进行。排除患有糖尿病、不稳定型缺血性心脏病或行动不便的患者。所有数据均在剑桥的临床研究机构收集。使用代谢综合征的各项指标得出标准化复合代谢风险评分(zMS)作为主要结局。试验状态:随访结束。
我们随机分配了 100 名参与者(50 名进入干预组,50 名进入对照组)。平均年龄为 71.4 岁(67.4-76.3 岁)。总体而言,96%的参与者完成了随访测量。无严重不良事件。采用意向治疗分析,与对照组相比,运动组 zMS 无显著降低(0.07[95%CI-0.03,0.17],p=0.19)。然而,与对照组相比,运动组体重、腰围和肝内脂肪明显减少,有氧健身能力提高,异常葡萄糖代谢的患病率降低 68%(OR 0.32[95%CI0.11-0.92],p=0.035)。方案分析的结果相似。
结论/解释:参加监督有氧运动干预导致体重减轻、健身能力提高以及一些但不是所有代谢结局的改善。在适当筛选的老年人中,这种干预似乎是安全的。
controlled-trials.com ISRCTN60986572
医学研究委员会。