Suppr超能文献

[对数最小分辨角对数视力表和斯内伦视力表上阈值插值法与整行法用于视力测试的比较]

[Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing].

作者信息

Veselý P, Ventruba J

机构信息

Klinika nemocí ocních a optometrie LF MU a FN u sv. Anny, Brno.

出版信息

Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2009 Oct;65(5):191-4.

Abstract

The main goal of our study was to prove the statistical significant difference between the threshold interpolation logMAR method on ETDRS chart and the whole-line method on Snellen chart with Sloan letters. We had 108 measurements with the threshold interpolation method and the whole-line method on ETDRS chart and the whole-line method on Snellen chart. The average value measured with the threshold method in ETDRS was 1,132 (min. 0,660, max. 1,580), with the whole-line method on ETDRS it was 1,134 (min. 0,630, max. 1,580) and with the whole-line method on Snellen chart it was 1,183 (min. 0,630, max. 1,600). We have proved statistical significant difference between the threshold interpolation method made on ETDRS chart and the whole-line method made on Snellen chart (p < 0.001). The values measured with the whole-line method on Snellen chart were overvalued. The exact and reliable measuring of visual acuity is an important component of further examinations (e.g. contrast sensitivity, perimetry, tonometry), which enable us to make a correct diagnosis of pathological changes on human eye structures.

摘要

我们研究的主要目标是证明ETDRS视力表上的阈值插值logMAR方法与使用斯隆字母的斯内伦视力表上的整行法之间存在统计学显著差异。我们分别使用阈值插值法和整行法在ETDRS视力表上以及整行法在斯内伦视力表上进行了108次测量。ETDRS视力表上阈值法测量的平均值为1.132(最小值0.660,最大值1.580),ETDRS视力表上整行法测量的平均值为1.134(最小值0.630,最大值1.580),斯内伦视力表上整行法测量的平均值为1.183(最小值0.630,最大值1.600)。我们已经证明ETDRS视力表上的阈值插值法与斯内伦视力表上的整行法之间存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.001)。斯内伦视力表上整行法测量的值被高估。准确可靠地测量视力是进一步检查(如对比敏感度、视野检查、眼压测量)的重要组成部分,这些检查能使我们对人眼结构的病理变化做出正确诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验