Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1124-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00557.x.
Abstract Public health research requires sound design and thoughtful consideration of potential biases that may influence the validity of results. It also requires careful implementation of protocols and procedures that are likely to translate from the research environment to actual clinical practice. This article is the product of a breakout session from the 2009 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference entitled "Public Health in the ED: Screening, Surveillance, and Intervention" and serves to describe in detail aspects of performing emergency department (ED)-based public health research, while serving as a resource for current and future researchers. In doing so, the authors describe methodologic features of study design, participant selection and retention, and measurements and analyses pertinent to public health research. In addition, a number of recommendations related to research methods and future investigations related to public health work in the ED are provided. Public health investigators are poised to make substantial contributions to this important area of research, but this will only be accomplished by employing sound research methodology in the context of rigorous program evaluation.
摘要 公共卫生研究需要合理的设计和对可能影响结果有效性的潜在偏差的深思熟虑。它还需要仔细实施协议和程序,这些协议和程序很可能从研究环境转化到实际的临床实践中。本文是 2009 年学术急诊医学共识会议题为“ED 中的公共卫生:筛查、监测和干预”的分组讨论的成果,旨在详细描述在急诊科进行公共卫生研究的各个方面,同时为当前和未来的研究人员提供资源。为此,作者描述了与研究设计、参与者选择和保留以及与公共卫生研究相关的测量和分析相关的方法学特征。此外,还提供了一些与研究方法和未来与 ED 中公共卫生工作相关的调查有关的建议。公共卫生研究人员有望在这一重要研究领域做出重大贡献,但这只有在严格的项目评估背景下采用合理的研究方法才能实现。