Research Unit, Sardenya Primary Health Care Centre, Barcelona, Spain.
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):239-45. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp101. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
To assess the effectiveness of an intervention after comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients over 74 years in primary care.
Randomized controlled trial with 18 months of follow-up. Patients in the control group (CG) followed usual care. Patients in the intervention group (IG) were classified as at risk or non-risk of frailty based on the CGA. Patients at non-risk of frailty in the IG were provided with recommendations about healthy habits and adherence to treatment in group sessions, while patients at risk of frailty were visited individually by a geriatrician.
Six hundred and twenty patients were randomized to the IG (49.7%) or to the CG (50.3%), 83.2% completed follow-up. Cox's proportional hazards model showed as covariates the study group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.22), risk of frailty (HR 1.33; 95% CI 0.71-2.51) and the interaction between both (HR 3.08; 95% CI 1.22-7.78). Forty-nine percent of the patients in the IG and 43% in the CG were at risk of frailty at baseline. At the end of the study, 27.9% of the IG and 13.5% of the CG had reversed their initial at risk of frailty status (P = 0.027). Multivariate predictors of reversible risk of frailty were younger age, not being at risk of depression, low consumption of medications and the intervention itself.
A specific intervention in patients over 74 years attended in primary care reduces morbidity and mortality in patients at risk of frailty and increases the proportion of patients that reversed their initial status at risk of frailty.
评估综合老年评估(CGA)后干预对减少初级保健中 74 岁以上患者发病率和死亡率的效果。
这是一项为期 18 个月随访的随机对照试验。对照组(CG)患者接受常规护理。干预组(IG)患者根据 CGA 评估为虚弱风险或非风险。IG 中无虚弱风险的患者在小组会议中接受关于健康习惯和治疗依从性的建议,而有虚弱风险的患者则由老年病医生进行个别访视。
620 名患者被随机分配到 IG(49.7%)或 CG(50.3%),83.2%完成了随访。Cox 比例风险模型显示协变量为研究组(风险比 [HR] 0.58;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.28-1.22)、虚弱风险(HR 1.33;95% CI 0.71-2.51)和两者之间的相互作用(HR 3.08;95% CI 1.22-7.78)。IG 中有 49%和 CG 中有 43%的患者在基线时存在虚弱风险。在研究结束时,IG 中有 27.9%和 CG 中有 13.5%的患者逆转了最初的虚弱风险状态(P=0.027)。可逆转虚弱风险的多变量预测因素为年龄较小、无抑郁风险、药物使用率低和干预本身。
在初级保健中为 74 岁以上患者提供的特定干预措施可降低虚弱风险患者的发病率和死亡率,并增加了逆转最初虚弱风险状态的患者比例。