• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年病干预在初级保健中的效果:一项随机临床试验。

Effectiveness of a geriatric intervention in primary care: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Research Unit, Sardenya Primary Health Care Centre, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):239-45. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp101. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmp101
PMID:20053673
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of an intervention after comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in reducing morbidity and mortality in patients over 74 years in primary care.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trial with 18 months of follow-up. Patients in the control group (CG) followed usual care. Patients in the intervention group (IG) were classified as at risk or non-risk of frailty based on the CGA. Patients at non-risk of frailty in the IG were provided with recommendations about healthy habits and adherence to treatment in group sessions, while patients at risk of frailty were visited individually by a geriatrician.

RESULTS

Six hundred and twenty patients were randomized to the IG (49.7%) or to the CG (50.3%), 83.2% completed follow-up. Cox's proportional hazards model showed as covariates the study group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-1.22), risk of frailty (HR 1.33; 95% CI 0.71-2.51) and the interaction between both (HR 3.08; 95% CI 1.22-7.78). Forty-nine percent of the patients in the IG and 43% in the CG were at risk of frailty at baseline. At the end of the study, 27.9% of the IG and 13.5% of the CG had reversed their initial at risk of frailty status (P = 0.027). Multivariate predictors of reversible risk of frailty were younger age, not being at risk of depression, low consumption of medications and the intervention itself.

CONCLUSIONS

A specific intervention in patients over 74 years attended in primary care reduces morbidity and mortality in patients at risk of frailty and increases the proportion of patients that reversed their initial status at risk of frailty.

摘要

目的

评估综合老年评估(CGA)后干预对减少初级保健中 74 岁以上患者发病率和死亡率的效果。

方法

这是一项为期 18 个月随访的随机对照试验。对照组(CG)患者接受常规护理。干预组(IG)患者根据 CGA 评估为虚弱风险或非风险。IG 中无虚弱风险的患者在小组会议中接受关于健康习惯和治疗依从性的建议,而有虚弱风险的患者则由老年病医生进行个别访视。

结果

620 名患者被随机分配到 IG(49.7%)或 CG(50.3%),83.2%完成了随访。Cox 比例风险模型显示协变量为研究组(风险比 [HR] 0.58;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.28-1.22)、虚弱风险(HR 1.33;95% CI 0.71-2.51)和两者之间的相互作用(HR 3.08;95% CI 1.22-7.78)。IG 中有 49%和 CG 中有 43%的患者在基线时存在虚弱风险。在研究结束时,IG 中有 27.9%和 CG 中有 13.5%的患者逆转了最初的虚弱风险状态(P=0.027)。可逆转虚弱风险的多变量预测因素为年龄较小、无抑郁风险、药物使用率低和干预本身。

结论

在初级保健中为 74 岁以上患者提供的特定干预措施可降低虚弱风险患者的发病率和死亡率,并增加了逆转最初虚弱风险状态的患者比例。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a geriatric intervention in primary care: a randomized clinical trial.老年病干预在初级保健中的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):239-45. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp101. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
2
Operationalizing a frailty index from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment.通过标准化综合老年评估实施衰弱指数
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Nov;52(11):1929-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52521.x.
3
The effectiveness of a comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention program for frailty in community-dwelling older people: a randomized, controlled trial.社区居住老年人衰弱的综合老年评估干预方案的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Feb;50 Suppl 1:S39-42. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4943(10)70011-X.
4
Predicting mortality of psychogeriatric patients: a simple prognostic frailty risk score.预测心理老年患者的死亡率:一个简单的预后虚弱风险评分。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Sep;85(1007):464-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.073353.
5
A randomized, controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department--the DEED II study.急诊科老年患者出院后综合老年评估与多学科干预的随机对照试验——DEED II研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1417-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52401.x.
6
Effects of exercise programs on falls and mobility in frail and pre-frail older adults: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.运动计划对体弱和准体弱老年人跌倒及活动能力的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;87(7):885-96. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.005.
7
Development of an easy prognostic score for frailty outcomes in the aged.一种用于老年衰弱结局的简易预后评分系统的开发。
Age Ageing. 2008 Mar;37(2):161-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm195. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
8
Recovery of functional impairment after acute illness and mortality: one-year follow-up study.急性疾病后功能障碍的恢复与死亡率:一年随访研究
Gerontology. 2009;55(3):269-74. doi: 10.1159/000193068. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
9
Frail patients are at increased risk for mortality and prolonged institutional care after cardiac surgery.虚弱的患者在心脏手术后的死亡率和长期机构护理方面风险增加。
Circulation. 2010 Mar 2;121(8):973-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.841437. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
10
A patient-completed screening instrument for functional disability in the elderly.一种由患者填写的老年人功能残疾筛查工具。
Am J Med. 1991 Mar;90(3):320-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.基于社区的复杂干预措施,针对体弱老年人维持其独立性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514.
2
Interventions to prevent the onset of frailty in adults aged 60 and older (PRAE-Frail): a systematic review and network meta-analysis.预防60岁及以上成年人衰弱发生的干预措施(PRAE-Frail):系统评价和网状Meta分析
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Oct;15(5):1169-1185. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01013-x. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings.
社区环境中体弱老年人综合护理的病例管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 23;5(5):CD013088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013088.pub2.
4
Using electronic consultation (eConsult) to identify frailty in provider-to-provider communication: a feasibility and validation study.利用电子咨询(eConsult)在医患沟通中识别虚弱:一项可行性和验证研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 9;23(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03870-w.
5
Identification of Factors Affecting the Increased Percentage of CGA Recommendations among Patients on Geriatric Ward.确定影响老年病房患者 CGA 推荐增加百分比的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2065. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032065.
6
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for community-dwelling, high-risk, frail, older people.社区居住的、高风险的、体弱的老年人的全面老年评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD012705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012705.pub2.
7
Health outcomes and implementation barriers and facilitators of comprehensive geriatric assessment in community settings: a systematic integrative review [PROSPERO registration no.: CRD42021229953].社区环境中综合老年评估的健康结果及实施障碍和促进因素:系统综合评价 [PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021229953]。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 29;22(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03024-4.
8
Measurement System for Unsupervised Standardized Assessments of Timed Up and Go Test and 5 Times Chair Rise Test in Community Settings-A Usability Study.用于社区环境下定时起立测试和 5 次椅子站立测试的无监督标准化评估的测量系统:一项可用性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;22(3):731. doi: 10.3390/s22030731.
9
What long-term care interventions have been published between 2010 and 2020? Results of a WHO scoping review identifying long-term care interventions for older people around the world.2010 年至 2020 年期间发表了哪些长期护理干预措施?一项针对全球老年人的长期护理干预措施的世界卫生组织范围界定审查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):e054492. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054492.
10
Zulfiqar Frailty Scale: Overview, Stakes, and Possibilities.祖尔菲卡尔衰弱量表:概述、风险与可能性。
Medicines (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;8(12):73. doi: 10.3390/medicines8120073.