Suppr超能文献

从贝伐单抗转换为雷珠单抗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性。安全吗?

Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration. Is it safe?

机构信息

Ophthalmiatrio Eye Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2009;4:457-61. doi: 10.2147/cia.s8367. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report our experiences in changing from intravitreal bevacizumab to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 34 patients (36 eyes) who were treated with monthly injections of intravitreal bevacizumab for six months and then switched to monthly injections of ranibizumab for 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity measurements (BCVA), contact lens biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography were performed at the baseline examination and then monthly. Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Following bevacizumab treatment, retinal thickness decreased (P = 0.033) while BCVA improved (P = 0.040). Changing from bevacizumab to ranibizumab resulted in a transient decrease in BCVA (P = 0.045) and an increase in retinal thickness (P = 0.042). In addition, three eyes presented with a large subretinal hemorrhage. However, final retinal thickness was better than the initial thickness and the value following the bevacizumab course. No major ocular or systemic side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab was clinically effective in the long term but the change of treatment from bevacizumab to a half-size molecule with less half-life in the vitreous such as ranibizumab contributed to a transient "instability" in the eye which may have triggered the large subretinal hemorrhage. There is insufficient experience reported in the literature in switching from one agent to another. A prospective study with controls is necessary to determine whether it is safe to change from one medication to another.

摘要

目的

报告我们在年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)中将玻璃体内贝伐单抗转换为雷珠单抗的经验。

设计

回顾性病例系列。

参与者和方法

我们回顾性地审查了 34 名患者(36 只眼)的记录,这些患者接受了每月一次的玻璃体内贝伐单抗注射治疗 6 个月,然后转换为每月一次的雷珠单抗注射治疗 12 个月。在基线检查时以及之后每月进行最佳矫正视力(BCVA)测量、接触镜生物显微镜检查、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和荧光素血管造影。采用卡方检验进行统计学分析。

结果

贝伐单抗治疗后,视网膜厚度降低(P = 0.033),而 BCVA 改善(P = 0.040)。从贝伐单抗转换为雷珠单抗导致 BCVA 短暂下降(P = 0.045)和视网膜厚度增加(P = 0.042)。此外,三只眼出现了大的视网膜下出血。然而,最终的视网膜厚度优于初始厚度和贝伐单抗治疗后的厚度。未观察到主要的眼部或全身副作用。

结论

雷珠单抗在长期治疗中是有效的,但从贝伐单抗转换为玻璃体半衰期较短的半分子药物,如雷珠单抗,导致眼部暂时的“不稳定”,可能引发大的视网膜下出血。文献中报道的从一种药物转换为另一种药物的经验不足。需要进行前瞻性研究并设立对照组,以确定从一种药物转换为另一种药物是否安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dce8/2801585/15d40d5d873c/cia-4-457f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验