Suppr超能文献

左侧胰腺导管腺癌切除术十年经验:从传统开腹手术到腹腔镜手术的演变及初步经验。

Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1533-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0806-7. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With increasing laparoscopic experience, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy is being regarded as a safe and effective treatment for benign and borderline malignant lesions of the pancreas; however, its application for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still debatable.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (DPS) for distal pancreatic cancer at our institution. We have performed laparoscopic DPS partly based on radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for well-selected left-sided PDAC since 2007. We compared laparoscopic DPS to conventional DPS according to various clinicopathologic factors.

RESULTS

From January 1999 to December 2008, 45 patients underwent conventional DPS for resectable left-sided PDAC, and 18 needed combined adjacent organ resection for potential margin negative (R0) resection. The median survival of resected left-sided PDAC was 27.9 months with a 5-year survival of 28.9%. A small amount of intraoperative bleeding [< or =760 ml Exp(beta) = 6.312, p = 0.001] and R0 resection [Exp(beta) = 4.349, p = 0.090] were the most significant prognostic factors. To achieve bloodless and R0 resection, the potential indication for laparoscopic DPS was suspicious pancreatic cancer confined to the pancreas that could be removed by DPS without resection of the adjacent organs. Five patients underwent laparoscopic/robot-assisted DPS for left-sided PDAC. Compared to conventional DPS, only the operation time (p = 0.011) and tumor size (p = 0.031) were significantly different, but other clinicopathologic variables were comparable. All patients still are alive. Four patients have lived without tumor recurrence (follow-up = 4-22 months), and only one experienced multiple liver metastasis and subsequent retroperitoneal local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic/robot-assisted modified anterior RAMPS may be technically feasible for well-selected PDAC. The oncologic feasibility still remains to be determined due to limited experience.

摘要

背景

随着腹腔镜技术经验的增加,腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(伴或不伴脾切除术)被认为是治疗胰腺良性和交界性肿瘤的一种安全有效的方法;然而,其在左侧胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的应用仍存在争议。

方法

我们分析了在我院接受常规胰体尾切除术(DPS)治疗胰体尾癌的患者。自 2007 年以来,我们根据 RAMPS 原则,对部分选择合适的左侧 PDAC 患者进行了腹腔镜 DPS 治疗。我们根据各种临床病理因素比较了腹腔镜 DPS 和常规 DPS。

结果

1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,45 例患者接受了常规 DPS 治疗可切除的左侧 PDAC,18 例患者因潜在的阴性切缘(R0)切除而需要联合相邻器官切除。接受根治性切除的左侧 PDAC 患者的中位生存期为 27.9 个月,5 年生存率为 28.9%。术中出血量较少(≤760ml Exp(beta) = 6.312,p = 0.001)和 R0 切除(Exp(beta) = 4.349,p = 0.090)是最重要的预后因素。为了实现无血和 R0 切除,腹腔镜 DPS 的潜在适应证是局限于胰腺的可疑胰腺癌,可通过 DPS 切除而无需切除相邻器官。5 例患者接受了腹腔镜/机器人辅助 DPS 治疗左侧 PDAC。与常规 DPS 相比,只有手术时间(p = 0.011)和肿瘤大小(p = 0.031)有显著差异,但其他临床病理变量无显著差异。所有患者均存活。4 例患者无肿瘤复发(随访时间为 4-22 个月),仅 1 例发生多发性肝转移和随后的腹膜后局部复发。

结论

对于选择合适的 PDAC,腹腔镜/机器人辅助改良前 RAMPS 可能在技术上是可行的。由于经验有限,其肿瘤学可行性仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验