Kim Song C, Park Kwan T, Hwang Ji W, Shin Hyeng C, Lee Sang S, Seo Dong W, Lee Sung K, Kim Myung H, Han Duck J
Department of Surgery, Ulsan University College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2261-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9973-1. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Despite recent advances in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery, few studies have compared laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection (LDPR) with open distal pancreatic resection (ODPR). This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes for LDPR and ODPR performed at a single institution.
For this study, 93 patients with benign pancreatic disease underwent LDPR, and 35 patients with benign pancreatic disease underwent ODPR. Patient demographic characteristics, operative times, perioperative complications, length of hospital stay, and return to normal diet were compared retrospectively between the two groups.
The LDPR and ODPR groups had the same demographic characteristics. The median operative time was 195 min in the LDPR group and 190 min in the ODPR group (p>0.05). The rate of spleen preservation was higher in the LDPR group (40.8%) than in the ODPR group (5.7%) (p<0.05) No operative mortality occurred in either group. The overall complication rate was 24.7% in the LDPR group and 29% in the ODPR group (p>0.05). The rate of pancreas-related complications was 11.8% in the LDPR group and 17.2% in the ODPR group (p>0.05). Pancreatic fistula developed in 8.6% of the LDPR group and in 14.3% of the ODPR group (p>0.05). Bowel movement return to normal and resumption of normal diet were achieved 2.8+/-1.3 days after the operation in the LDPR group and 4.5+/-1.6 days after the operation in the ODPR group (p<0.05). The median duration of hospital stay was 10 days for the LDPR group, which was significantly shorter than the 16 days for the ODPR group (p<0.01).
The use of LDPR for benign lesions of the distal pancreas is feasible and safe. The LDPR procedure is associated with operative times and complication rates similar to those for ODPR, but LDPR has the advantages of an earlier return to normal bowel movements and normal diet and shorter hospital stays than ODPR.
尽管腹腔镜胰腺手术最近取得了进展,但很少有研究比较腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDPR)和开放远端胰腺切除术(ODPR)。本研究旨在比较在单一机构进行的LDPR和ODPR的临床结果。
在本研究中,93例良性胰腺疾病患者接受了LDPR,35例良性胰腺疾病患者接受了ODPR。回顾性比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、手术时间、围手术期并发症、住院时间和恢复正常饮食情况。
LDPR组和ODPR组的人口统计学特征相同。LDPR组的中位手术时间为195分钟,ODPR组为190分钟(p>0.05)。LDPR组的脾脏保留率(40.8%)高于ODPR组(5.7%)(p<0.05)。两组均未发生手术死亡。LDPR组的总体并发症发生率为24.7%,ODPR组为29%(p>0.05)。LDPR组的胰腺相关并发症发生率为11.8%,ODPR组为17.2%(p>0.05)。LDPR组8.6%发生胰瘘,ODPR组14.3%发生胰瘘(p>0.05)。LDPR组术后2.8±1.3天恢复正常排便并恢复正常饮食,ODPR组术后4.5±1.6天恢复(p<0.05)。LDPR组的中位住院时间为10天,明显短于ODPR组的16天(p<0.01)。
LDPR用于远端胰腺良性病变是可行且安全的。LDPR手术的手术时间和并发症发生率与ODPR相似,但LDPR具有比ODPR更早恢复正常排便和正常饮食以及住院时间更短的优势。