个人基因组学：信息可能有害。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Personal genomics: information can be harmful.

作者信息

Ransohoff D F, Khoury M J

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. email:

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02232.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02232.x

PMID:20055897

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Personal genomics: information can be harmful.

Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02232.x.

Getting personal.

Nature. 2008 Oct 23;455(7216):1007. doi: 10.1038/4551007a.

A pragmatic consideration of ethical issues relating to personal genomics.

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160902966795.

Social networking and personal genomics: suggestions for optimizing the interaction.

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):15-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894039.

We are the genes we've been waiting for: rational responses to the gathering storm of personal genomics.

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):30-1. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893999.

Genethics 2.0: phenotypes, genotypes, and the challenge of databases generated by personal genome testing.

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):19-21. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893890.

Direct-to-consumer personal genome testing: the problem is not ignorance--it is market failure.

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):13-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160902874411.

Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying?

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):11-3. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894005.

Direct-to-consumer genome-wide scans: astrologicogenomics or simple scams?

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):54-6. doi: 10.1080/15265160902894021.

Genome studies: genetics by numbers.

Nature. 2008 Jan 31;451(7178):516-8. doi: 10.1038/451516a.

引用本文的文献

Returning negative results from large-scale genomic screening: Experiences from the eMERGE III network.

Am J Med Genet A. 2021 Feb;185(2):508-516. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62002. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

Neutral, Negative, or Negligible? Changes in Patient Perceptions of Disease Risk Following Receipt of a Negative Genomic Screening Result.

J Pers Med. 2020 Apr 17;10(2):24. doi: 10.3390/jpm10020024.

Proposed guidelines to evaluate scientific validity and evidence for genotype-based dietary advice.

Genes Nutr. 2017 Dec 15;12:35. doi: 10.1186/s12263-017-0584-0. eCollection 2017.

Translational genomics.

Appl Transl Genom. 2014 May 10;3(3):43-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2014.05.001. eCollection 2014 Sep 1.

An Insufferable Business: Ethics, Nonhuman Animals and Biomedical Experiments.

Animals (Basel). 2015 Jul 22;5(3):624-42. doi: 10.3390/ani5030376.

Effects of genetic and environmental risk assessment feedback on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

J Behav Med. 2015 Oct;38(5):777-86. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9626-5. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Genetic and environmental risk assessment and colorectal cancer screening in an average-risk population: a randomized trial.

Ann Intern Med. 2014 Oct 21;161(8):537-45. doi: 10.7326/M14-0765.

Cancer screening and genetics: a tale of two paradigms.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jun;23(6):909-16. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1016. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Quantification of population benefit in evaluation of biomarkers: practical implications for disease detection and prevention.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Mar 6;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-15.

Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(2):95-104. doi: 10.1159/000358413. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验