Suppr超能文献

分娩模式对理解2型糖尿病基因组风险的影响。

Impact of delivery models on understanding genomic risk for type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Haga S B, Barry W T, Mills R, Svetkey L, Suchindran S, Willard H F, Ginsburg G S

机构信息

Duke Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(2):95-104. doi: 10.1159/000358413. Epub 2014 Feb 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Genetic information, typically communicated in-person by genetic counselors, can be challenging to comprehend; delivery of this information online--as is becoming more common--has the potential of increasing these challenges.

METHODS

To address the impact of the mode of delivery of genomic risk information, 300 individuals were recruited from the general public and randomized to receive genomic risk information for type 2 diabetes mellitus in-person from a board-certified genetic counselor or online through the testing company's website.

RESULTS

Participants were asked to indicate their genomic risk and overall lifetime risk as reported on their test report as well as to interpret their genomic risk (increased, decreased, or same as population). For each question, 59% of participants correctly indicated their risk. Participants who received their results in-person were more likely than those who reviewed their results on-line to correctly interpret their genomic risk (72 vs. 47%, p = 0.0002) and report their actual genomic risk (69 vs. 49%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The delivery of personal genomic risk through a trained health professional resulted in significantly higher comprehension. Therefore, if the online delivery of genomic test results is to become more widespread, further evaluation of this method of communication may be needed to ensure the effective presentation of results to promote comprehension.

摘要

背景

遗传信息通常由遗传咨询师亲自传达,理解起来可能具有挑战性;而如今越来越普遍的在线传递这种信息,有可能加剧这些挑战。

方法

为了研究基因组风险信息传递方式的影响,从普通公众中招募了300人,并随机分配他们通过获得认证的遗传咨询师亲自获取2型糖尿病的基因组风险信息,或通过检测公司网站在线获取。

结果

要求参与者指出他们检测报告中报告的基因组风险和总体终生风险,并解释他们的基因组风险(增加、降低或与总体人群相同)。对于每个问题,59%的参与者正确指出了他们的风险。亲自收到检测结果的参与者比在线查看结果的参与者更有可能正确解释他们的基因组风险(72%对47%,p = 0.0002),并报告他们实际的基因组风险(69%对49%,p = 0.002)。

结论

通过训练有素的健康专业人员传递个人基因组风险信息,能显著提高理解程度。因此,如果基因组检测结果的在线传递要更广泛地开展,可能需要对这种沟通方式进行进一步评估,以确保有效呈现结果,促进理解。

相似文献

3
Public trust in genomic risk assessment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.公众对2型糖尿病基因组风险评估的信任度。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Jun;23(3):401-8. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9674-3. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

10
Internet Versus Virtual Reality Settings for Genomics Information Provision.互联网与虚拟现实环境下的基因组学信息提供
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Jan;22(1):7-14. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0453. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

6
Public knowledge of and attitudes toward genetics and genetic testing.公众对遗传学和基因检测的了解及态度。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013 Apr;17(4):327-35. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0350. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验