• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The DSM-IV definition of severity of major depression: inter-relationship and validity.DSM-IV 重度抑郁症定义:相互关系与有效性。
Psychol Med. 2010 Oct;40(10):1691-701. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709992066. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
2
Deconstructing major depression: a validation study of the DSM-IV symptomatic criteria.解构重度抑郁症:DSM-IV 症状标准的验证研究。
Psychol Med. 2010 Oct;40(10):1679-90. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709992157. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
3
DSM criteria for major depression: evaluating symptom patterns using latent-trait item response models.重度抑郁症的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》标准:使用潜在特质项目反应模型评估症状模式
Psychol Med. 2005 Apr;35(4):475-87. doi: 10.1017/s0033291704003563.
4
Does bereavement-related major depression differ from major depression associated with other stressful life events?与丧亲相关的重度抑郁症与与其他应激性生活事件相关的重度抑郁症有区别吗?
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;165(11):1449-55. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111757. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
5
Boundaries of major depression: an evaluation of DSM-IV criteria.重度抑郁症的界限:对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准的评估
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;155(2):172-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.2.172.
6
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
7
Validating Angst's "ups & downs" personality trait as a new marker of bipolar II disorder.验证安格斯特的“起伏”人格特质作为双相II型障碍的一种新标志物。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Feb;254(1):48-54. doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0455-8.
8
Levels of disability in major depression: findings from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS).重度抑郁症的残疾程度:荷兰心理健康调查与发病率研究(NEMESIS)的结果
J Affect Disord. 2003 Oct;77(1):53-64. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00099-x.
9
Evidence for multiple genetic factors underlying DSM-IV criteria for major depression.支持 DSM-IV 重性抑郁障碍标准的多种遗传因素。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;70(6):599-607. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.751.
10
A tetrachoric factor analysis validation of mixed depression.混合性抑郁症的四分相关因素分析验证
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and support vector machines for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder in adolescents.静息态功能磁共振成像与支持向量机用于青少年重度抑郁症的诊断
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):1696-1707. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i11.1696.
2
Iran Quality of Care in Medicine Program (IQCAMP): Design and Outcomes.伊朗医疗保健质量提升计划(IQCAMP):设计与结果。
Arch Iran Med. 2023 Mar 1;26(3):126-137. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.21.
3
Role of leukocytes, gender, and symptom domains in the influence of depression on hospitalization and mortality risk: Findings from the Moli-sani study.白细胞、性别和症状领域在抑郁症对住院和死亡风险影响中的作用:莫利-萨尼研究的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 13;13:959171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.959171. eCollection 2022.
4
Prevalence and risk factors of depressive symptoms among dialysis patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Khartoum, Sudan: A cross-sectional study.苏丹喀土穆终末期肾病(ESRD)透析患者抑郁症状的患病率及危险因素:一项横断面研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jul 30;9(7):3639-3643. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1229_19. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Double trouble: Do symptom severity and duration interact to predicting treatment outcomes in adolescent depression?双重困境:症状严重程度和持续时间是否相互作用影响青少年抑郁症的治疗结果?
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Aug;131:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103637. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
The severity of psychiatric disorders.精神疾病的严重程度。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):258-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20569.
7
Mental health problems among medical students in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.巴西医学生的心理健康问题:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec;39(4):369-378. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2223. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Simultaneous Decomposition of Depression Heterogeneity on the Person-, Symptom- and Time-Level: The Use of Three-Mode Principal Component Analysis.在个体、症状和时间层面同时分解抑郁异质性:三模态主成分分析的应用
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0132765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132765. eCollection 2015.
9
Risk factors for incidence and persistence of disability in chronic major depression and alcohol use disorders: longitudinal analyses of a population-based study.慢性重度抑郁症和酒精使用障碍中残疾发生率及持续存在的危险因素:一项基于人群研究的纵向分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 17;12:186. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0186-0.
10
Data-driven subtypes of major depressive disorder: a systematic review.基于数据驱动的重性抑郁障碍亚型:系统综述。
BMC Med. 2012 Dec 4;10:156. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-156.

本文引用的文献

1
The long-term course of depression: development of an empirical index and identification of early adult outcomes.抑郁症的长期病程:一个实证指标的发展及早期成人结局的识别。
Psychol Med. 2009 Mar;39(3):403-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708003851. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
2
Predicting outcomes of primary care patients with major depression: development of a depression prognosis index.
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Aug;58(8):1049-56. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.8.1049.
3
Severity and duration of depression, not personality factors, predict short term outcome in the treatment of major depression.抑郁症的严重程度和持续时间而非人格因素可预测重度抑郁症治疗的短期结果。
J Affect Disord. 2007 Dec;104(1-3):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
4
Developing brief scales for use in clinical practice: the reliability and validity of single-item self-report measures of depression symptom severity, psychosocial impairment due to depression, and quality of life.开发用于临床实践的简短量表:抑郁症状严重程度、抑郁所致心理社会功能损害及生活质量的单项自我报告测量方法的信度和效度。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;67(10):1536-41. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n1007.
5
Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.汉密尔顿抑郁量表/蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁评定量表访谈的开发与信度:一种综合抑郁症状评定量表
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Nov 29;145(1):21-37. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.009. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
6
The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures.蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表:测量方法比较
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;16(8):601-11. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
7
Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship between depression severity and functional status.抑郁症严重程度与功能状态之间关系中的种族和民族差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Apr;57(4):498-503. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.4.498.
8
Relationships among psychosocial functioning, diagnostic comorbidity, and the recurrence of generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and major depression.心理社会功能、诊断共病与广泛性焦虑症、惊恐障碍和重度抑郁症复发之间的关系。
J Anxiety Disord. 2005;19(7):752-66. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.10.002. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
9
Gradations of clinical severity and sensitivity to change assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Japanese patients with depression.在日本抑郁症患者中,使用贝克抑郁量表第二版评估临床严重程度等级和对变化的敏感性。
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Jun 30;135(3):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.03.014.
10
Validation of the Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale in patients with major depression; is the total score a valid measure of illness severity?贝克-拉范森抑郁量表和汉密尔顿抑郁量表在重度抑郁症患者中的效度验证;总分是否是疾病严重程度的有效衡量指标?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005 Feb;111(2):144-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00440.x.

DSM-IV 重度抑郁症定义:相互关系与有效性。

The DSM-IV definition of severity of major depression: inter-relationship and validity.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Free University Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2010 Oct;40(10):1691-701. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709992066. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291709992066
PMID:20056021
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2909488/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severity is an important characteristic of major depression (MD) and an 'episode specifier' in DSM-IV classifying depressive episodes as 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe'. These severity subtypes rely on three different measures of severity: number of criteria symptoms, severity of the symptoms and degree of functional disability. No prior empirical study has evaluated the coherence and validity of the DSM-IV definition of severity of MD.

METHOD

In a sample of 1015 (518 males, 497 females) Caucasian twins from a population-based registry who met criteria for MD in the year prior to interview, factor analysis and logistic regression were conducted to examine the inter-relationships of the three severity measures and their associations with a wide range of potential validators including demographic factors, risk for future episodes, risk of MD in the co-twin, characteristics of the depressive episode, the pattern of co-morbidity, and personality traits.

RESULTS

Correlations between the three severity measures were significant but moderate. Factor analysis indicated the existence of a general severity factor, but the factor was not highly coherent. The three severity measures showed differential predictive ability for most of the validators.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of MD as defined by the DSM-IV is a multifaceted and heterogeneous construct. The three proposed severity measures reflect partly overlapping but partly independent domains with differential validity as assessed by a wide range of clinical characteristics. Clinicians should probably use a combination of severity measures as proposed in DSM-IV rather than privileging one.

摘要

背景

严重程度是重性抑郁障碍(MD)的一个重要特征,也是 DSM-IV 中用于将抑郁发作分类为“轻度”、“中度”或“重度”的“发作特征”。这些严重程度亚型依赖于三种不同的严重程度测量方法:症状标准数量、症状严重程度和功能障碍程度。之前没有实证研究评估 DSM-IV 对 MD 严重程度的定义的一致性和有效性。

方法

在一项基于人群的登记处的 1015 名(518 名男性,497 名女性)白种人双胞胎样本中,这些双胞胎在访谈前的一年中符合 MD 的标准。对因子分析和逻辑回归进行了分析,以检验三种严重程度测量方法之间的相互关系及其与广泛的潜在有效验证因素之间的关联,这些验证因素包括人口统计学因素、未来发作的风险、同卵双胞胎中的 MD 风险、抑郁发作的特征、共病模式和人格特征。

结果

三种严重程度测量方法之间的相关性显著但中等。因子分析表明存在一个一般严重程度因素,但该因素不是高度一致的。三种严重程度测量方法对大多数验证因素具有不同的预测能力。

结论

DSM-IV 定义的 MD 严重程度是一个多方面和异质的结构。三种提议的严重程度测量方法反映了部分重叠但部分独立的领域,具有不同的有效性,由广泛的临床特征评估。临床医生可能应该使用 DSM-IV 中提议的组合严重程度测量方法,而不是只选择一种。