Department of Psychology, Free University Berlin, Germany.
Psychol Med. 2010 Oct;40(10):1691-701. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709992066. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
Severity is an important characteristic of major depression (MD) and an 'episode specifier' in DSM-IV classifying depressive episodes as 'mild', 'moderate' or 'severe'. These severity subtypes rely on three different measures of severity: number of criteria symptoms, severity of the symptoms and degree of functional disability. No prior empirical study has evaluated the coherence and validity of the DSM-IV definition of severity of MD.
In a sample of 1015 (518 males, 497 females) Caucasian twins from a population-based registry who met criteria for MD in the year prior to interview, factor analysis and logistic regression were conducted to examine the inter-relationships of the three severity measures and their associations with a wide range of potential validators including demographic factors, risk for future episodes, risk of MD in the co-twin, characteristics of the depressive episode, the pattern of co-morbidity, and personality traits.
Correlations between the three severity measures were significant but moderate. Factor analysis indicated the existence of a general severity factor, but the factor was not highly coherent. The three severity measures showed differential predictive ability for most of the validators.
Severity of MD as defined by the DSM-IV is a multifaceted and heterogeneous construct. The three proposed severity measures reflect partly overlapping but partly independent domains with differential validity as assessed by a wide range of clinical characteristics. Clinicians should probably use a combination of severity measures as proposed in DSM-IV rather than privileging one.
严重程度是重性抑郁障碍(MD)的一个重要特征,也是 DSM-IV 中用于将抑郁发作分类为“轻度”、“中度”或“重度”的“发作特征”。这些严重程度亚型依赖于三种不同的严重程度测量方法:症状标准数量、症状严重程度和功能障碍程度。之前没有实证研究评估 DSM-IV 对 MD 严重程度的定义的一致性和有效性。
在一项基于人群的登记处的 1015 名(518 名男性,497 名女性)白种人双胞胎样本中,这些双胞胎在访谈前的一年中符合 MD 的标准。对因子分析和逻辑回归进行了分析,以检验三种严重程度测量方法之间的相互关系及其与广泛的潜在有效验证因素之间的关联,这些验证因素包括人口统计学因素、未来发作的风险、同卵双胞胎中的 MD 风险、抑郁发作的特征、共病模式和人格特征。
三种严重程度测量方法之间的相关性显著但中等。因子分析表明存在一个一般严重程度因素,但该因素不是高度一致的。三种严重程度测量方法对大多数验证因素具有不同的预测能力。
DSM-IV 定义的 MD 严重程度是一个多方面和异质的结构。三种提议的严重程度测量方法反映了部分重叠但部分独立的领域,具有不同的有效性,由广泛的临床特征评估。临床医生可能应该使用 DSM-IV 中提议的组合严重程度测量方法,而不是只选择一种。