Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Aug;131:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103637. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
Studies suggest that depression severity and duration interact to predict outcomes in depression treatment. To our knowledge, no study has explored this question in a sample with a placebo control, two therapies, and their combination nor with adolescents. We used data from the Treatment of Adolescent Depression Study (N = 439), in which adolescent were randomized to placebo (PBO), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), antidepressants medications (MEDs), or their combination (COMB). We explore the interaction between depression severity, chronicity, and treatments (vs. placebo) in predicting outcomes. There was interaction between severity and chronicity when comparing COMB and CBT with PBO, but not MEDs. In non-chronic depression, the effects of CBT were inversely related to severity to the point that CBT appeared iatrogenic with more severe depression. In chronic depression, the effects of CBT did not vary by severity, but the relative effects of COMB grew, being smallest in milder, more dysthymic-like depression, and largest in chronic-severe depression. These findings support calls to classify depression by severity and chronicity as well efforts to risk stratify patients to different intensity of care according to these variables.
研究表明,抑郁严重程度和持续时间相互作用,共同预测抑郁治疗的结果。据我们所知,在有安慰剂对照、两种疗法及其组合的样本中,尚未有研究探讨这一问题,也没有针对青少年的研究。我们使用了青少年抑郁治疗研究(Treatment of Adolescent Depression Study,TADS)的数据(N=439),其中青少年被随机分配至安慰剂(PBO)、认知行为疗法(CBT)、抗抑郁药物(MEDs)或它们的组合(COMB)。我们探讨了抑郁严重程度、慢性和治疗方法(与安慰剂相比)在预测结果方面的相互作用。在将 COMB 和 CBT 与 PBO 进行比较时,严重程度和慢性之间存在交互作用,但与 MEDs 不存在交互作用。在非慢性抑郁中,CBT 的效果与严重程度呈负相关,以至于 CBT 在更严重的抑郁中似乎具有治疗性。在慢性抑郁中,CBT 的效果不因严重程度而异,但 COMB 的相对效果会增加,在较轻、更似恶劣心境的抑郁中最小,在慢性严重抑郁中最大。这些发现支持了根据严重程度和慢性对抑郁进行分类的呼吁,以及根据这些变量对患者进行不同强度护理的风险分层的努力。