• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于腮腺手术的颈乳突面部切口与改良面部提升切口:患者反馈比较

Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified facelift incision for parotid surgery: a patient feedback comparison.

作者信息

Wasson Joseph, Karim Haider, Yeo Justin, Panesar Jaan

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, Luton, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):40-3. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836440009.

DOI:10.1308/003588410X12518836440009
PMID:20056059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024615/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, the cervicomastoidfacial (CMF) incision is used to excise benign tumours of the parotid gland. The rhytidectomy or modified facelift (MF) incision allows an alternative approach which leaves no visible neck scar. The objective of this study was to establish the frequency of each surgical approach used and identify any difference in complication and patient satisfaction between the two incisions for benign conditions of the parotid gland.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 101 case notes for patients who underwent parotidectomy by both ENT and maxillofacial departments between January 2006 and February 2008 was undertaken. All histologically confirmed cases of malignancy were excluded. For each incision, immediate postoperative complications were obtained from the notes. A postal patient outcome evaluation questionnaire sought information regarding persistent and late complications as well as a visual analogue scar satisfaction score for both incisions.

RESULTS

Overall, 79 parotidectomies were included (59 CMF incisions, 20 MF incisions). Of CMF incisions, 34% suffered facial weakness immediately postoperatively versus 20% of MF incisions. Of CMF incisions, 4% suffered postoperative haematomas versus none following MF incisions. In the study cohort, 47 (60%) responded to the postal feedback questionnaire (33 CMF versus 14 MF respondents). Information regarding immediate and late postoperative ipsilateral facial paraesthesia and gustatory sweating was obtained. Mean visual analogue scar satisfaction scores were 9.4 for CMF incisions and 8.9 for MF incisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate and late complications for CMF and MF approaches for benign disease parotidectomy were comparable, but scar satisfaction following MF incision was not greater than CMF incisions.

摘要

引言

传统上,颈乳突面部(CMF)切口用于切除腮腺良性肿瘤。除皱术或改良面部提升(MF)切口提供了另一种方法,不会留下可见的颈部瘢痕。本研究的目的是确定每种手术方法的使用频率,并确定在腮腺良性疾病中两种切口在并发症和患者满意度方面是否存在差异。

患者与方法

对2006年1月至2008年2月期间由耳鼻喉科和颌面外科进行腮腺切除术的101例患者的病例记录进行回顾性分析。所有组织学确诊的恶性病例均被排除。对于每个切口,从记录中获取术后即刻并发症。通过邮寄患者结局评估问卷来获取有关持续性和晚期并发症的信息,以及两种切口的视觉模拟瘢痕满意度评分。

结果

总体而言,纳入了79例腮腺切除术(59例采用CMF切口,20例采用MF切口)。CMF切口组中,34%的患者术后即刻出现面部无力,而MF切口组为20%。CMF切口组中,4%的患者出现术后血肿,而MF切口组无此情况。在研究队列中,47例(60%)回复了邮寄反馈问卷(33例CMF切口患者和14例MF切口患者)。获取了有关术后即刻和晚期同侧面部感觉异常及味觉出汗的信息。CMF切口的平均视觉模拟瘢痕满意度评分为9.4分,MF切口为8.9分。

结论

CMF和MF两种方法用于腮腺良性疾病切除术的即刻和晚期并发症相当,但MF切口后的瘢痕满意度并不高于CMF切口。

相似文献

1
Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified facelift incision for parotid surgery: a patient feedback comparison.用于腮腺手术的颈乳突面部切口与改良面部提升切口:患者反馈比较
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):40-3. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836440009.
2
Modified facelift incision for parotidectomy.用于腮腺切除术的改良面部提升切口。
J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Jul;108(7):574-8. doi: 10.1017/s002221510012746x.
3
Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified rhytidectomy incision for benign parotid tumors.颈颌面部与改良除皱切口在良性腮腺肿瘤中的应用比较。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar-Apr;79(2):168-72. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130030.
4
Improving esthetic results in benign parotid surgery: statistical evaluation of facelift approach, sternocleidomastoid flap, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap application.改善腮腺良性手术的美学效果:对面部提升术、胸锁乳突肌瓣及颞浅筋膜瓣应用的统计学评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;69(4):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of modified facelift incision versus modified Blair incision in parotidectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析改良面中部提升切口与改良布莱尔切口在腮腺切除术的应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03483-6.
6
Modified facelift approach combined with a superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap in the treatment of benign parotid tumors.改良面部提升术联合表浅肌肉腱膜系统皮瓣治疗腮腺良性肿瘤
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Oct;43(8):1655-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.049. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
7
Modified facelift incision for partial parotidectomy versus bayonet-shaped incision: a comparison using visual analog scale.改良面部提升切口用于部分腮腺切除术与刺刀状切口的比较:使用视觉模拟评分法的对比研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3269-75. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3878-0. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
8
The extended indication of parotidectomy using the modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis of a single institution.改良面部提升切口在良性病变腮腺切除术的扩展应用:单中心回顾性分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2228-37. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1209-1.
9
Individualized Use of Facelift, Retroauricular Hairline, and V-Shaped Incisions for Parotidectomy.腮腺切除术的个性化使用改良腮腺切口、耳后发际线切口和V形切口
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;78(12):2339.e1-2339.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Gland-preserving surgery of benign parotid tumours via postauricular sulcus incision: Is it safe and effective with the scarless incision?经耳后沟切口行腮腺良性肿瘤保留腺体手术:无痕切口是否安全有效?
Oral Oncol. 2022 Apr;127:105808. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105808. Epub 2022 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Mini-Incision Parotidectomy-Our Technique.小切口腮腺切除术——我们的技术
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):6174-6179. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02882-5. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Comparison of various surgical incisions in parotidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.腮腺切除术不同手术切口的比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;12:972498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.972498. eCollection 2022.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of modified facelift incision versus modified Blair incision in parotidectomy.系统评价和荟萃分析改良面中部提升切口与改良布莱尔切口在腮腺切除术的应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 16;11(1):24106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03483-6.
4
Robot-assisted submandibular gland excision via modified facelift incision.经改良面部提升切口的机器人辅助下颌下腺切除术
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep 5;39(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40902-017-0122-4. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Modified facelift incision for partial parotidectomy versus bayonet-shaped incision: a comparison using visual analog scale.改良面部提升切口用于部分腮腺切除术与刺刀状切口的比较:使用视觉模拟评分法的对比研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3269-75. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3878-0. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
6
Basal cell adenoma in the deep portion of the parotid gland: a case report.腮腺深部基底细胞腺瘤:一例报告
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;41(6):352-6. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.6.352. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Improving the quality of life of parotid surgery patients through a modified facelift incision and great auricular nerve preservation.通过改良的面部提升切口和保留耳大神经来提高腮腺手术患者的生活质量。
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2013 Dec 16;2:Doc20. doi: 10.3205/iprs000040. eCollection 2013.
8
Small access postaural parotidectomy: an analysis of techniques, feasibility and safety.小切口耳后腮腺切除术:技术、可行性及安全性分析
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jul;273(7):1879-83. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3691-9. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified rhytidectomy incision for benign parotid tumors.颈颌面部与改良除皱切口在良性腮腺肿瘤中的应用比较。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar-Apr;79(2):168-72. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130030.
10
The extended indication of parotidectomy using the modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis of a single institution.改良面部提升切口在良性病变腮腺切除术的扩展应用:单中心回顾性分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2228-37. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1209-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of facial palsy and severe Frey's syndrome after conservative parotidectomy for benign disease: analysis of 610 operations.良性疾病行保守性腮腺切除术后发生面瘫和严重味觉出汗综合征的风险:610例手术分析
Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 Oct;126(10):1104-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480600672618.
2
Quality of life following parotidectomy for malignant and benign disease.腮腺切除术后恶性和良性疾病患者的生活质量。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1060-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000135326.50939.c1.
3
Parotidectomy: review of treatment and outcomes.腮腺切除术:治疗方法及疗效综述
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Jul;74(7):563-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.02988.x.
4
Patients' perspectives on the short- and long-term outcomes following surgery for benign parotid neoplasms.患者对腮腺良性肿瘤手术后短期和长期结果的看法。
J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Aug;117(8):624-9. doi: 10.1258/002221503768199960.
5
Modified facelift incision for parotidectomy.用于腮腺切除术的改良面部提升切口。
J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Jul;108(7):574-8. doi: 10.1017/s002221510012746x.
6
Incidence, diagnosis, and classification of salivary gland tumors. Part 1.唾液腺肿瘤的发病率、诊断及分类。第1部分。
Oncology (Williston Park). 1989 Feb;3(2):47-56; discussion 56, 58, 62.