• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

留置输尿管导管症状特征的比较。

Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters.

作者信息

Pryor J L, Langley M J, Jenkins A D

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville.

出版信息

J Urol. 1991 Apr;145(4):719-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38433-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38433-1
PMID:2005686
Abstract

The signs and symptoms produced by 4 different types of 7F double pigtail catheters, including Cook polyurethane pigtail stent, Surgitek Silitek Uropass, Cook C-Flex and Van-Tec Soft stent, were analyzed prospectively. The stents were placed in 45 men and 28 women ranging in age from 23 to 72 years old. A total of 44 catheters had a suture attached to the bladder end of the catheter, which exited from the urethral meatus to facilitate removal. The remaining 29 catheters had no suture attached. Symptoms were evaluated at 2 and 6 days after insertion and 1 week following removal of the catheter, and included urinary frequency, nocturia, hematuria, flank pain, suprapubic pain, dysuria and pain on removal of the catheter. Frequency and nocturia were evaluated in minutes, pain was graded on a subjective scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain), and dysuria and hematuria were assessed qualitatively. There were no significant differences among the 4 types of catheters in terms of frequency, nocturia, hematuria, flank pain, suprapubic pain and dysuria. In addition, there was no significant difference in urinary symptoms between catheters with and without a suture at either 2 or 6 days after insertion nor was there any difference in pain on removal of catheters with (mean 3.9) and without (mean 5.0) suture. We found that catheter composition and use of suture to facilitate removal did not significantly affect patient morbidity.

摘要

对4种不同类型的7F双猪尾导管(包括库克聚氨酯猪尾支架、Surgitek Silitek Uropass、库克C-Flex和Van-Tec软支架)产生的体征和症状进行了前瞻性分析。这些支架被放置在45名男性和28名女性体内,年龄范围为23至72岁。共有44根导管在膀胱端附有缝线,缝线从尿道口引出以便于取出。其余29根导管未附缝线。在插入导管后第2天和第6天以及拔除导管1周后对症状进行评估,包括尿频、夜尿、血尿、胁腹疼痛、耻骨上疼痛、排尿困难和拔除导管时的疼痛。尿频和夜尿以分钟为单位进行评估,疼痛按主观评分从0(无疼痛)至10(剧痛)分级,排尿困难和血尿进行定性评估。4种类型的导管在尿频、夜尿、血尿、胁腹疼痛、耻骨上疼痛和排尿困难方面无显著差异。此外,插入导管后第2天或第6天,有缝线和无缝线的导管在尿路症状方面无显著差异,拔除有缝线(平均3.9)和无缝线(平均5.0)的导管时的疼痛也无差异。我们发现导管的组成以及使用缝线便于取出对患者的发病率没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters.留置输尿管导管症状特征的比较。
J Urol. 1991 Apr;145(4):719-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38433-1.
2
Morbidity associated with indwelling internal ureteral stents after shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后留置输尿管内支架相关的发病率。
J Urol. 1989 Mar;141(3):510-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40875-5.
3
A Multicenter Study of Patient-Reported Infectious and Noninfectious Complications Associated With Indwelling Urethral Catheters.留置导尿管相关的患者报告的感染性和非感染性并发症的多中心研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Aug 1;178(8):1078-1085. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2417.
4
[Double J ureteral catheter. Clinical complications].[双J输尿管导管。临床并发症]
Arch Esp Urol. 1998 May;51(4):361-73.
5
Determining the noninfectious complications of indwelling urethral catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.确定留置导尿管的非传染性并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Sep 17;159(6):401-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00006.
6
Failure of the double-curved ureteral stent.双曲输尿管支架失败。
J Urol. 1982 Feb;127(2):317-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53759-3.
7
Symptoms arising from Double-J ureteral stents.双J输尿管支架引起的症状。
J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):37-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42282-8.
8
Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.用于管理住院成年患者短期排尿问题的尿道导管类型:Cochrane系统评价短版
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):738-46. doi: 10.1002/nau.20645.
9
Comparison of efficacy and bladder irritation symptoms among three different ureteral stents: a double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial.三种不同输尿管支架的疗效及膀胱刺激症状比较:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验
Scand J Urol. 2015 Jun;49(3):237-41. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.981205. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
10
Suprapubic catheters: a comparison of suprapubic versus urethral catheters in the treatment of acute urinary retention.耻骨上导尿管:耻骨上导尿管与尿道导尿管治疗急性尿潴留的比较
Aust N Z J Surg. 1987 Jan;57(1):33-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1987.tb01236.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Ureteral stents: A brief narrative review of the different polymeric types, their characteristics, and their connection to stent-related symptoms.输尿管支架:对不同聚合物类型、其特性及其与支架相关症状的联系的简要叙述性综述。
Urol Ann. 2023 Oct-Dec;15(4):360-367. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_39_23. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
2
Impact of Ureteral Stent Material on Stent-related Symptoms: A Systematic Review of the Literature.输尿管支架材料对支架相关症状的影响:文献系统综述
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Oct 19;45:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.005. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Comparison of silicone versus polyurethane ureteral stents: a prospective controlled study.
硅胶与聚氨酯输尿管支架比较:一项前瞻性对照研究。
BMC Urol. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-0577-y.
4
Pooled analysis of efficacy and safety of ureteral stent removal using an extraction string.使用取出线进行输尿管支架取出术的疗效和安全性的汇总分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(37):e17169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017169.
5
Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials.输尿管支架设计与材料的进展
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Apr 10;19(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y.
6
Ureteric stents on extraction strings: a systematic review of literature.输尿管支架取石装置:文献系统综述。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Apr;46(2):129-136. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0898-1. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
Management of ureteric stone in pediatric patients.小儿输尿管结石的管理
Indian J Urol. 2010 Oct;26(4):564-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.74462.
8
Ureteroscopy: The standard of care in the management of upper tract urolithiasis in children.输尿管镜检查:儿童上尿路结石治疗的护理标准。
Indian J Urol. 2010 Oct;26(4):555-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.74459.
9
Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective comparative study.无管与传统经皮肾镜取石术的术后并发症:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Urol Res. 2011 Dec;39(6):477-81. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0367-9. Epub 2011 Feb 20.
10
Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urol Res. 2011 Dec;39(6):459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0363-0. Epub 2011 Feb 18.