Stroke. 2010 Mar;41(3):566-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566844. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
Acute stroke clinical trials are conducted primarily at academic medical centers. As a result, patients living in rural areas are excluded from participation, results may not be generalizable to nonacademic settings, and studies may be slow to recruit subjects. Telemedicine can provide rural patients with emergency neurovascular consultation. We sought to determine whether telemedicine facilitates enrollment into acute stroke trials.
We have an established rural "hub and spoke" telestroke network. From 2005 to 2009, we participated in 2 time-sensitive acute stroke trials: Factor Seven for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke and Minocycline to Improve Neurological Outcome. Candidates for the 2 trials could be identified at either the hub or at the spokes, with patients presenting to the latter transferred to the hub for enrollment. We analyzed the times from symptom onset to consultation via telemedicine, arrival at the hub, and to initiation of a study drug to determine the impact of telemedicine on study enrollment.
Nineteen of 28 subjects enrolled in the 2 trials were identified initially at an outside facility via a telemedicine link. An additional 9 candidates identified by telemedicine could not be enrolled because of transportation time. Arrival at the hub was 127 minutes later (median, 207 [95% CI, 145 to 255] versus 80 [95% CI, 55 to 142]; P=0.0002), and study drug was started 74 minutes later (median, 298 [95% CI, 218 to 352] versus 225 [95% CI, 147 to 330]; P=0.05) for subjects who were identified via telemedicine and required transport to the hub compared with local subjects who presented directly to the hub.
Telemedicine can enhance enrollment into time-sensitive acute stroke trials. However, transfer of subjects to the hub results in delays in study initiation for some and precludes enrollment for others similar to the weaknesses of "ship and drip" thrombolytic strategies. To save time, efforts are needed to enroll clinical trial subjects and begin the research drug at the remote site under telemedicine guidance.
急性脑卒中临床试验主要在学术医疗中心进行。因此,居住在农村地区的患者被排除在参与之外,研究结果可能无法推广到非学术环境,并且研究可能难以招募受试者。远程医疗可以为农村患者提供紧急神经血管咨询。我们旨在确定远程医疗是否有助于急性脑卒中试验的入组。
我们建立了一个成熟的农村“中心辐射式”远程脑卒中网络。从 2005 年到 2009 年,我们参与了两项时间敏感的急性脑卒中试验:Factor Seven for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke 和 Minocycline to Improve Neurological Outcome。这两项试验的候选人可以在中心或辐射站点被识别出来,而在后者出现的患者则被转移到中心进行入组。我们分析了从症状发作到通过远程医疗进行咨询、到达中心以及开始使用研究药物的时间,以确定远程医疗对研究入组的影响。
在这两项试验中,28 名入组的受试者中有 19 名最初是通过远程医疗链接在外部医疗机构被识别出来的。还有 9 名通过远程医疗识别出来的候选者由于交通时间而无法入组。到达中心的时间晚了 127 分钟(中位数,207 [95%CI,145 至 255] 与 80 [95%CI,55 至 142];P=0.0002),并且开始使用研究药物的时间晚了 74 分钟(中位数,298 [95%CI,218 至 352] 与 225 [95%CI,147 至 330];P=0.05),与直接到中心就诊的本地患者相比,需要转运到中心的远程医疗识别的患者。
远程医疗可以增强时间敏感的急性脑卒中试验的入组。然而,将患者转移到中心会导致一些患者的研究开始延迟,并且对于其他患者来说,这类似于“输送溶栓药物”策略的弱点而无法入组。为了节省时间,需要在远程医疗指导下,在远程站点招募临床试验受试者并开始使用研究药物。