Suppr超能文献

采用两种 ELISA 法检测急性冠脉综合征和稳定性冠心病患者的氧化型脂蛋白(a):使用针对氧化型脂蛋白(a)或氧化型 LDL 的不同捕获抗体。

Measurement of oxidized lipoprotein (a) in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease by 2 ELISAs: using different capture antibody against oxidized lipoprotein (a) or oxidized LDL.

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, PR China.

出版信息

Clin Biochem. 2010 Apr;43(6):571-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.12.017. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical value of oxidized lipoprotein(a) [ox-Lp(a)] levels.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Ox-Lp(a) were measured by 2 ELISAs using antibodies against ox-Lp(a) [ox-Lp(a)1] or oxidized low-density lipoprotein [ox-Lp(a)2], and studied in 161 acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients, 114 stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and 100 control subjects.

RESULTS

Ox-Lp(a)1 was found related with ox-Lp(a)2 (r=0.864, P=0.000). Controlling for plasma lipids, Lp(a) and clinical characteristics, odds ratios of ox-Lp(a)1 on ACS and stable CAD were 5.06 (95% confidence interval 1.82-14.04) and 2.20 (0.78-6.22); those of ox-Lp(a)2 were 3.37 (1.07-10.63) and 1.35 (0.41-4.48), respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed that performances of ox-Lp(a)1 were significantly superior to those for ox-Lp(a)2 in ACS (area: 0.803 vs. 0.723, P<0.001) and stable CAD (area: 0.670 vs. 0.607, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Ox-Lp(a) levels using antibodies against ox-Lp(a) may represent a better risk marker than those using antibodies against oxidized low-density lipoprotein for ACS and stable CAD.

摘要

目的

评估氧化脂蛋白(a) [ox-Lp(a)]水平的临床价值。

设计和方法

使用针对 ox-Lp(a) [ox-Lp(a)1]或氧化型低密度脂蛋白 [ox-Lp(a)2]的 2 种 ELISA 法测量 ox-Lp(a),并在 161 例急性冠脉综合征 (ACS)患者、114 例稳定型冠心病 (CAD)患者和 100 例对照者中进行研究。

结果

发现 ox-Lp(a)1 与 ox-Lp(a)2 相关 (r=0.864,P=0.000)。在校正血浆脂质、Lp(a)和临床特征后,ox-Lp(a)1 对 ACS 和稳定型 CAD 的比值比分别为 5.06 (95%置信区间 1.82-14.04)和 2.20 (0.78-6.22);ox-Lp(a)2 的比值比分别为 3.37 (1.07-10.63)和 1.35 (0.41-4.48)。受试者工作特征曲线分析证实,ox-Lp(a)1 在 ACS (曲线下面积:0.803 比 0.723,P<0.001)和稳定型 CAD (曲线下面积:0.670 比 0.607,P<0.01)中的性能明显优于 ox-Lp(a)2。

结论

针对 ox-Lp(a)的抗体检测 ox-Lp(a)水平可能比针对氧化型低密度脂蛋白的抗体检测 ox-Lp(a)水平更能作为 ACS 和稳定型 CAD 的更好风险标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验