• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有失公正的歧视:保险公司暂停使用基因检测结果是否自相矛盾?

Unjustified discrimination: is the moratorium on the use of genetic test results by insurers a contradiction in terms?

机构信息

Sussex Law School, School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex, Falmer, East Sussex, BN1 9QQ, UK.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2010 Sep;18(3):279-93. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0137-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-009-0137-9
PMID:20063201
Abstract

This paper considers the legal position of genetic test results in insurance law in England and Wales. The strict position is that this information is material to the decision of the insurer to offer insurance cover and should be disclosed by insurance applicants. However, the British Government and the Association of British Insurers have agreed to a moratorium on the use of genetic test results in insurance, which will run until 2014. The moratorium prohibits unfavourable treatment of insurance clients on their basis of their genetics, unless it can be justified. In this paper, I consider the notion of genetic discrimination and ask whether it is possible to justify the concept in such a way that its existence should be accepted. The paper suggests that the insurance industry and the general public have different viewpoints on the concept of discrimination, and that this causes much of the disagreement over the issue of using genetic test results in insurance.

摘要

本文探讨了英国和威尔士保险法中基因检测结果的法律地位。严格来说,这些信息对保险公司决定是否提供保险承保至关重要,保险申请人应予以披露。然而,英国政府和英国保险协会已同意暂停基因检测结果在保险中的使用,直至 2014 年。暂停期间,除非有正当理由,否则不得基于客户的基因状况对其进行不利的保险待遇。本文探讨了基因歧视的概念,并探讨了是否可以通过某种方式证明这一概念的合理性,从而接受其存在。本文认为,保险行业和公众对歧视的概念有不同的看法,这也是导致在保险中使用基因检测结果问题上存在分歧的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Unjustified discrimination: is the moratorium on the use of genetic test results by insurers a contradiction in terms?有失公正的歧视:保险公司暂停使用基因检测结果是否自相矛盾?
Health Care Anal. 2010 Sep;18(3):279-93. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0137-9.
2
Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Genetic Testing and Personal Insurance Products in Australia.澳大利亚人类遗传学会立场声明:澳大利亚的基因检测与个人保险产品
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Dec;21(6):533-537. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.60. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Genetics and insurance in Britain: why more than just the Atlantic divides the English-speaking nations.英国的遗传学与保险:为何不止大西洋将英语国家分隔开来。
Nat Genet. 1998 Oct;20(2):119-21. doi: 10.1038/2416.
4
Genetics and Insurance in Australia: Concerns around a Self-Regulated Industry.澳大利亚的遗传学与保险:对一个自我监管行业的担忧。
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(4):247-256. doi: 10.1159/000481450. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
Just genetic discrimination? The ethics of Australian law reform proposals.仅仅是基因歧视?澳大利亚法律改革提案的伦理问题。
Univ N S W Law J. 2002;25(1):160-84.
6
UK insurers oppose moratorium plea on use of genetic data.英国保险公司反对暂停使用基因数据的请求。
Nature. 1998 Jan 1;391(6662):3. doi: 10.1038/33983.
7
Genetics and the British insurance industry.遗传学与英国保险业。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Apr;25(2):157-62. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.2.157.
8
"Uninsurable because of a genetic test": a qualitative study of consumer views about the use of genetic test results in Australian life insurance.“由于基因测试而无法投保”:一项关于澳大利亚寿险中使用基因测试结果的消费者观点的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):827-836. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01602-1. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
Proposal: a position for the insurance industry on genetic testing.提案:保险业在基因检测方面的立场。
J Insur Med. 1997;29(4):260-2.
10
Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.澳大利亚的消费者在提供基因检测后,对寿险中的基因歧视仍存在担忧:一项消费者调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):286-294. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01373-1. Epub 2023 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.全球对遗传歧视的恐惧和担忧趋势:系统文献综述。
J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):275-82. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
A protocol for the identification and validation of novel genetic causes of kidney disease.一项用于识别和验证肾病新遗传病因的方案。
BMC Nephrol. 2015 Sep 15;16:152. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0148-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Why disclosure of genetic tests for health insurance should be voluntary.为何医疗保险的基因检测披露应是自愿的。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006 Jul;11(3):184-6. doi: 10.1258/135581906777641730.
2
Dissecting "discrimination".剖析“歧视”。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2005 Fall;14(4):455-63.
3
FACE facts: why human genetics will always provoke bioethics.直面现实:为何人类遗传学总会引发生物伦理学问题。
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):267-75, 191. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00473.x.
4
What makes genetic discrimination exceptional?是什么让基因歧视与众不同?
Am J Law Med. 2003;29(1):77-116.
5
Genetic information and life insurance: a 'real' risk?遗传信息与人寿保险:一种“真实”的风险?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2003 Aug;11(8):561-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200998.
6
Human genetics. A rational view of insurance and genetic discrimination.人类遗传学。对保险与基因歧视的理性看法。
Science. 2002 Jul 12;297(5579):195-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1070987.
7
What is genetic discrimination, and when and how can it be prevented?什么是基因歧视,以及何时以及如何能够预防它?
Genet Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;3(5):354-8. doi: 10.1097/00125817-200109000-00005.
8
What would you do? Specialists' perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination.你会怎么做?专家对癌症基因检测、预防性手术及保险歧视的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jun;18(12):2484-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.12.2484.
9
Genetic discrimination in life insurance: empirical evidence from a cross sectional survey of genetic support groups in the United Kingdom.人寿保险中的基因歧视:来自英国基因支持群体横断面调查的实证证据。
BMJ. 1998 Dec 12;317(7173):1632-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7173.1632.
10
The social and economic origins of genetic determinism: a case history of the American Eugenics Movement, 1900-1940 and its lessons for today.基因决定论的社会与经济根源:美国优生运动(1900 - 1940)个案史及其对当今的启示
Genetica. 1997;99(2-3):77-88. doi: 10.1007/BF02259511.