Krantz Elizabeth M, Cruickshanks Karen J, Klein Barbara E K, Klein Ronald, Huang Guan-Hua, Nieto F Javier
Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;128(1):88-92. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.349.
To compare refraction measured before and after pharmacologic cycloplegia.
This study used preliminary data from the Beaver Dam Offspring Study, which includes adult children of participants in the population-based Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study of older adults living in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Data were available for 5018 eyes of 2529 participants. Refraction was defined by the spherical equivalent (SE), using autorefractor readings. Differences were calculated as the SE after drops were administered minus the SE before drops were administered. Myopia was defined as SE of -1 diopter (D) or less; emmetropia, as SE more than -1 D and less than 1 D; and hyperopia, as SE of 1 D or more.
The mean age was 48 years (range, 22-84 years). The mean difference in SE between measurements before and after cycloplegia was 0.29 D (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.31). The difference decreased with age and varied by refractive status for participants younger than 50 years, with the largest differences observed among young persons with hyperopic refractive errors. Across all age groups, agreement on classifications of refraction was high (84%-92%).
Overall, clinically inconsequential differences were observed between SEs before and after pharmacologic cycloplegia, suggesting that cycloplegia may not be necessary in epidemiological studies of refraction in adults.
比较药物性睫状肌麻痹前后测量的屈光状态。
本研究使用了比弗代尔后代研究的初步数据,该研究包括威斯康星州比弗代尔以人群为基础的老年人听力损失流行病学研究参与者的成年子女。共有2529名参与者的5018只眼睛的数据可用。屈光状态由等效球镜度(SE)定义,使用自动验光仪读数。差值计算为滴药后SE减去滴药前SE。近视定义为SE为-1屈光度(D)或更低;正视定义为SE大于-1 D且小于1 D;远视定义为SE为1 D或更高。
平均年龄为48岁(范围22 - 84岁)。睫状肌麻痹前后测量的SE平均差值为0.29 D(95%置信区间,0.28 - 0.31)。该差值随年龄降低,并且在50岁以下参与者中因屈光状态而异,在远视屈光不正的年轻人中观察到的差值最大。在所有年龄组中,屈光状态分类的一致性很高(84% - 92%)。
总体而言,药物性睫状肌麻痹前后的SE之间观察到临床上无显著意义的差异,这表明在成人屈光流行病学研究中可能不需要进行睫状肌麻痹。