Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Qual Health Res. 2010 Feb;20(2):262-72. doi: 10.1177/1049732309357571.
We conducted a small-scale qualitative diary study to gather accounts from five facial cancer surgery patients. Participants were asked to record their experiences, thoughts, and feelings for up to 1 year, as they underwent and recovered from their surgery and adapted to living with alterations in their appearance. In this article, we consider evidence relating to the diary as a research tool and discuss our experiences of issues arising with the qualitative diary method employed in this study.These include comparability with interview data, factors affecting the quantity and quality of data (novelty, personal significance, and individual writing styles), chronological storytelling, and barriers to writing (visual difficulties and depression).
我们进行了一项小规模的定性日记研究,以收集五名面部癌症手术患者的叙述。参与者被要求记录他们的经历、想法和感受,最长可达 1 年,因为他们接受了手术并从手术中恢复过来,适应了自己外貌的改变。在本文中,我们考虑了与日记作为研究工具相关的证据,并讨论了我们在这项研究中使用定性日记方法时遇到的问题。这些问题包括与访谈数据的可比性、影响数据数量和质量的因素(新颖性、个人意义和个人写作风格)、时间顺序的叙述方式,以及写作的障碍(视力困难和抑郁)。