Suppr超能文献

基于 MRI 的乳房容积测量——三种不同软件解决方案的评估。

MRI-based breast volumetry-evaluation of three different software solutions.

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str., 130625 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2010 Oct;23(5):603-10. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9264-y.

Abstract

As lipofilling of the female breast is becoming more popular in plastic surgery, the use of MRI to assess breast volume has been employed to control postoperative results. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based breast volumetry software tools by comparing the measurements of silicone implant augmented breasts with the actual implant volume specified by the manufacturer. MRI-based volume analysis was performed in eight bilaterally augmented patients (46 ± 9 years) with three different software programs (Brainlab© I plan 2.6 neuronavigation software; mass analysis, version 5.3, Medis©; and OsiriX© v.3.0.2. 32-bit). The implant volumes analysed by the BrainLab© software had a mean deviation of 2.2 ± 1.7% (r = 0.99) relative to the implanted prosthesis. OsiriX© software analysis resulted in a mean deviation of 2.8 ± 3.0% (r = 0.99) and the Medis© software had a mean deviation of 3.1 ± 3.0% (r = 0.99). Overall, the volumes of all analysed breast implants correlated very well with the real implant volumes. Processing time was 10 min per breast with each system and 30 s (OsiriX©) to 5 min (BrainLab© and Medis©) per silicone implant. MRI-based volumetry is a powerful tool to calculate both native breast and silicone implant volume in situ. All software solutions performed well and the measurements were close to the actual implant sizes. The use of MRI breast volumetry may be helpful in: (1) planning reconstructive and aesthetic surgery of asymmetric breasts, (2) calculating implant size in patients with missing documentation of a previously implanted device and (3) assessing post-operative results objectively.

摘要

随着脂肪隆乳术在整形外科学中越来越受欢迎,使用 MRI 来评估乳房体积已被用于控制术后结果。因此,我们试图通过将硅胶植入物隆胸的测量值与制造商规定的实际植入物体积进行比较,来评估基于 MRI 的乳房体积分析软件工具的准确性。对 8 例双侧隆胸患者(46 ± 9 岁)进行了基于 MRI 的体积分析,使用了 3 种不同的软件程序(Brainlab© I plan 2.6 神经导航软件;mass analysis,version 5.3,Medis©;和 OsiriX© v.3.0.2. 32-bit)。BrainLab© 软件分析的植入物体积相对于植入假体的平均偏差为 2.2 ± 1.7%(r = 0.99)。OsiriX© 软件分析的结果为平均偏差 2.8 ± 3.0%(r = 0.99),Medis© 软件的平均偏差为 3.1 ± 3.0%(r = 0.99)。总体而言,所有分析的乳房植入物的体积与实际植入物体积非常吻合。每个系统对每侧乳房的处理时间为 10 分钟,每个硅胶植入物的时间为 30 秒(OsiriX©)至 5 分钟(BrainLab© 和 Medis©)。基于 MRI 的体积测量是计算原位自然乳房和硅胶植入物体积的强大工具。所有软件解决方案都表现良好,测量值接近实际植入物尺寸。MRI 乳房体积测量可用于:(1)计划不对称乳房的重建和美容手术,(2)计算缺失先前植入装置记录的患者的植入物大小,以及(3)客观评估术后结果。

相似文献

1
MRI-based breast volumetry-evaluation of three different software solutions.
J Digit Imaging. 2010 Oct;23(5):603-10. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9264-y.
2
[The use of mamma MRI volumetry to evaluate the rate of fat survival after autologous lipotransfer].
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2010 Apr;42(2):129-34. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243204. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
BreastImplantAnalyzer: An easy-to-use, validated tool for calculating breast implant volume from MRI data.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Nov;74(11):2885-2890. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.068. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
4
Calculation of silicone breast implant volumes using breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Aesthet Surg J. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):310-3. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2009.02.009.
6
Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):847-55. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9708-x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
7
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based breast volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Jun;39(3):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0493-9. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
Silicone-selective multishot echo-planar imaging for rapid MRI survey of breast implants.
Eur Radiol. 2007 Jul;17(7):1875-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0533-6. Epub 2007 Jan 23.
9
Breast carcinoma in augmented breasts: MRI findings.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):W599-604. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13221.

引用本文的文献

1
DIEP Flap Weights in Immediate 1-stage and 2-stage Breast Reconstruction: Considering Chest Wall Deformity.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 23;12(12):e6393. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006393. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Definitions of Abnormal Breast Size and Asymmetry: A Cohort Study of 400 Women.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2242-2252. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03400-4. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
An Online Calculator for Estimating Breast Implant Volume from Imaging.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 18;10(4):e4273. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004273. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Review of Quantitative Imaging for Objective Assessment of Fat Grafting Outcomes in Breast Surgery.
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 May 18;41(Suppl 1):S39-S49. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab050.
8
Volumetric Symmetry after Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Reasonable Goal.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 30;7(9):e2362. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002362. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Modern trends in lipomodeling.
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2017 Apr 3;6:Doc06. doi: 10.3205/iprs000108. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

2
Diagnosis of breast cancer: MDCT versus MRI.
Breast Cancer. 2008;15(3):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0049-9.
3
4
Breast imaging in the new era.
Cancer Imaging. 2004 Jan 12;4(2):39-50. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2003.0033.
5
The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7 Suppl 1):49S-61S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000286569.45745.6a.
6
Imaging breast cancer.
Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Jan;45(1):45-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2006.10.007.
7
Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Breast. 2007 Apr;16(2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
8
The efficacy of breast MRI in predicting breast conservation therapy.
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;94(3):220-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.20561.
9
Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners.
Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Mar;56(3):229-36. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000197774.80832.24.
10
An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images.
Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Dec;55(6):571-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000185459.49434.5f.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验