Department of Neurology and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2551, USA.
Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):811-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02494.x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
A drug holiday seems to produce seizure interval prolongation (SIP) after reinstitution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This effect was demonstrated mainly with carbamazepine. We evaluated SIP with newer AEDs and tested the relationship of SIP to history of AED tolerance.
We prospectively studied patients with refractory epilepsy admitted to the Vanderbilt epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) over a period of 12 months. We included only patients on levetiracetam, lamotrigine, or oxcarbazepine who had their AEDs withdrawn on admission and reinstituted without change upon discharge. We defined SIP as the interval from EMU discharge to first seizure minus the interval between the last two seizures before EMU admission.
A total of 43 patients completed the study; 15 were on monotherapy. SIP was greater than zero in this patient group (p < 0.0001), with a mean prolongation of 19.4 +/- 28.0 days. The average SIP was higher (p = 0.01) in patients on monotherapy (29.7 +/- 23.8 days) than patients on polytherapy (13.9 +/- 29.0 days). SIP tended to be greater in patients with a prior history of AED tolerance (25.7 +/- 36.8 days) compared to patient with no prior history of AED tolerance (14.0 +/- 16.3 days).
SIP does occur after brief AED withdrawal. This effect is greater in patients on monotherapy and tends to be larger in patients with a history of AED tolerance. The SIP effect may be related to the phenomenon of tolerance, clinically seen as resistance to AED therapeutic effect.
抗癫痫药物(AED)重新使用后,药物假期似乎会导致癫痫发作间隔延长(SIP)。这种效应主要在卡马西平中得到证实。我们评估了新的 AED 的 SIP,并测试了 SIP 与 AED 耐受史的关系。
我们前瞻性研究了在 12 个月期间入住范德比尔特癫痫监测单元(EMU)的难治性癫痫患者。我们仅纳入了入院时停用 AED 并在出院时无变化重新使用的左乙拉西坦、拉莫三嗪或奥卡西平的患者。我们将 SIP 定义为从 EMU 出院到首次发作的间隔减去 EMU 入院前最后两次发作之间的间隔。
共有 43 名患者完成了研究;15 名患者接受了单药治疗。在该患者组中,SIP 大于零(p<0.0001),平均延长了 19.4±28.0 天。与多药治疗的患者(13.9±29.0 天)相比,单药治疗的患者(29.7±23.8 天)的平均 SIP 更高(p=0.01)。与没有 AED 耐受史的患者(14.0±16.3 天)相比,有 AED 耐受史的患者(25.7±36.8 天)的 SIP 倾向于更大。
AED 短暂停药后确实会发生 SIP。这种效应在单药治疗的患者中更大,并且在有 AED 耐受史的患者中往往更大。SIP 效应可能与耐受现象有关,临床上表现为对 AED 治疗效果的抵抗。