Suppr超能文献

儿科药物摄入后的急诊部门使用:两个国家数据库的比较。

Emergency department use after pediatric pharmaceutical ingestion: comparison of two national databases.

机构信息

Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Jan;48(1):64-7. doi: 10.3109/15563650903397234.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As no "gold standard" measure exists for the number of children evaluated in emergency departments (EDs) for medication-related injuries, the public health impact is based on estimates. In January 2006 the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published a National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) estimate on unintentional pediatric medication exposure to children < or =4 years of age that resulted in an ED visit: 53,517 per year for the period 2001-2003. We sought to generate a parallel estimate using American Association of Poison Control Centers' (AAPCC) National Poison Data System (NPDS) to see how these estimates compare.

METHODS

To match data reported from the NEISS-AIP, NPDS was searched for the electronic medical records of children < or =4 years of age whose call type was an unintentional exposure to a pharmaceutical that involved presenting to a health care facility (HCF) in 2001-2003.

RESULTS

178,513 met all of the criteria: 57,100 in 2001; 60,098 in 2002; and 61,315 in 2003. Comparing NEISS-AIP to NPDS: 10% versus 13% were hospitalized; 72% versus 68% were either 1 or 2 years of age; and the substance distribution was acetaminophen (8.1%, 6.8%), cough/cold (7.5%, 9.6%), cardiovascular (7.8%, 11.0%), anticonvulsant (3.6%, 3.2%), and vitamins (4.5%, 3.4%).

CONCLUSION

These results are close suggesting that the actual number is near these numbers. The NPDS number is greater than NEISS-AIP point estimate but within the 95% confidence interval. As NPDS is an actual count and NEISS-AIP is an extrapolation from a sample, to the extent that every child presenting to an ED following a medication exposure is not reported to a poison center, both databases may underestimate the problem. The NEISS-AIP extrapolation tool may need to be reassessed.

摘要

背景

由于目前尚不存在评估急诊科(ED)中因药物相关伤害而接受评估的儿童人数的“金标准”方法,因此公共卫生影响是基于估计得出的。2006 年 1 月,《发病率和死亡率周报》发表了国家电子伤害监测系统-所有伤害项目(NEISS-AIP)对 2001-2003 年期间 4 岁以下儿童非故意药物暴露导致 ED 就诊的估计值:每年 53517 例。我们试图使用美国中毒控制中心协会(AAPCC)国家毒物数据系统(NPDS)生成一个平行估计值,以了解这些估计值的差异。

方法

为了匹配 NEISS-AIP 报告的数据,NPDS 搜索了 2001-2003 年期间年龄在 4 岁以下的儿童的电子病历,其呼叫类型为非故意药物暴露并涉及到医疗保健机构(HCF)就诊。

结果

178513 例符合所有标准:2001 年 57100 例;2002 年 60098 例;2003 年 61315 例。将 NEISS-AIP 与 NPDS 进行比较:住院率分别为 10%和 13%;72%和 68%为 1 或 2 岁;药物分布为对乙酰氨基酚(8.1%,6.8%)、咳嗽/感冒(7.5%,9.6%)、心血管(7.8%,11.0%)、抗惊厥药(3.6%,3.2%)和维生素(4.5%,3.4%)。

结论

这些结果非常接近,表明实际数量接近这些数字。NPDS 数量大于 NEISS-AIP 点估计值,但在 95%置信区间内。由于 NPDS 是实际计数,而 NEISS-AIP 是从样本中推断出来的,因此,每个因药物暴露而到 ED 就诊的儿童并非都向中毒控制中心报告,这两个数据库都可能低估了问题。可能需要重新评估 NEISS-AIP 外推工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验