• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对测量错误和未观察到的混杂因素的简化贝叶斯敏感性分析。

Simplified Bayesian sensitivity analysis for mismeasured and unobserved confounders.

作者信息

Gustafson P, McCandless L C, Levy A R, Richardson S

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2010 Dec;66(4):1129-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01377.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01377.x
PMID:20070294
Abstract

We examine situations where interest lies in the conditional association between outcome and exposure variables, given potential confounding variables. Concern arises that some potential confounders may not be measured accurately, whereas others may not be measured at all. Some form of sensitivity analysis might be employed, to assess how this limitation in available data impacts inference. A Bayesian approach to sensitivity analysis is straightforward in concept: a prior distribution is formed to encapsulate plausible relationships between unobserved and observed variables, and posterior inference about the conditional exposure-disease relationship then follows. In practice, though, it can be challenging to form such a prior distribution in both a realistic and simple manner. Moreover, it can be difficult to develop an attendant Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that will work effectively on a posterior distribution arising from a highly nonidentified model. In this article, a simple prior distribution for acknowledging both poorly measured and unmeasured confounding variables is developed. It requires that only a small number of hyperparameters be set by the user. Moreover, a particular computational approach for posterior inference is developed, because application of MCMC in a standard manner is seen to be ineffective in this problem.

摘要

我们研究在给定潜在混杂变量的情况下,结果变量与暴露变量之间的条件关联情况。人们担心一些潜在的混杂因素可能无法准确测量,而另一些则可能根本未被测量。可能会采用某种形式的敏感性分析,以评估可用数据中的这种局限性如何影响推断。贝叶斯敏感性分析方法在概念上很直接:形成一个先验分布来概括未观察到的变量与观察到的变量之间的合理关系,然后对条件暴露 - 疾病关系进行后验推断。然而,在实践中,以现实且简单的方式形成这样的先验分布可能具有挑战性。此外,开发一个能有效处理由高度未识别模型产生的后验分布的伴随马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)算法可能很困难。在本文中,我们开发了一种简单的先验分布,用于承认测量不佳和未测量的混杂变量。它只要求用户设置少量的超参数。此外,还开发了一种用于后验推断的特定计算方法,因为在这个问题中,以标准方式应用MCMC被认为是无效的。

相似文献

1
Simplified Bayesian sensitivity analysis for mismeasured and unobserved confounders.针对测量错误和未观察到的混杂因素的简化贝叶斯敏感性分析。
Biometrics. 2010 Dec;66(4):1129-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01377.x.
2
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.观察性研究中未测量混杂因素的贝叶斯敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2331-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.2711.
3
Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.协变量测量误差的贝叶斯调整:一种灵活的参数方法。
Stat Med. 2009 May 15;28(11):1580-600. doi: 10.1002/sim.3552.
4
Hierarchical Bayesian estimates of distributed MEG sources: theoretical aspects and comparison of variational and MCMC methods.分布式脑磁图源的分层贝叶斯估计:理论方面以及变分法与马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法的比较
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):669-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.001. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
5
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.贝叶斯敏感性分析在因果中介分析中对未测量混杂因素的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):515-531. doi: 10.1177/0962280217729844. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
6
Applying diffusion-based Markov chain Monte Carlo.应用基于扩散的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173453. eCollection 2017.
7
A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.贝叶斯分析与蒙特卡洛分析在未测量混杂因素敏感性分析中的比较
Stat Med. 2017 Aug 15;36(18):2887-2901. doi: 10.1002/sim.7298. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.使用测量混杂因素信息进行的敏感性分析,对未测量的混杂因素产生了改进的不确定性评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Oct 15.
9
Assessing the convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods: an example from evaluation of diagnostic tests in absence of a gold standard.评估马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法的收敛性:来自无金标准情况下诊断试验评估的一个例子。
Prev Vet Med. 2007 May 16;79(2-4):244-56. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.01.003. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
10
A gradient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for computing multivariate maximum likelihood estimates and posterior distributions: mixture dose-response assessment.用于计算多元极大似然估计值和后验分布的梯度马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法:混合剂量反应评估。
Risk Anal. 2012 Feb;32(2):345-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01672.x. Epub 2011 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bayesian latent class approach to causal inference with longitudinal data.一种用于纵向数据因果推断的贝叶斯潜在类别方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):55-68. doi: 10.1177/09622802241298704. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
unmconf : an R package for Bayesian regression with unmeasured confounders.unmconf:一个用于具有未测量混杂因素的贝叶斯回归的 R 包。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02322-2.
3
A practical introduction to Bayesian estimation of causal effects: Parametric and nonparametric approaches.
因果效应的贝叶斯估计实用介绍:参数化和非参数化方法
Stat Med. 2021 Jan 30;40(2):518-551. doi: 10.1002/sim.8761. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
4
Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.通过对混杂因素-结局关系的信息先验进行调整,以消除未测量的混杂。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0634-3.
5
Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.利用敏感性分析解决未观察到的混杂因素对倾向评分法中协变量测量误差的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Mar 1;187(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx248.
6
Trade-offs of Personal Versus More Proxy Exposure Measures in Environmental Epidemiology.个人与更多代理暴露测量在环境流行病学中的权衡。
Epidemiology. 2017 Sep;28(5):635-643. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000686.
7
Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.贝叶斯方法在倾向评分法中处理协变量测量误差的应用。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1078-1096. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9533-x. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
8
Prior event rate ratio adjustment for hidden confounding in observational studies of treatment effectiveness: a pairwise Cox likelihood approach.治疗效果观察性研究中隐藏混杂因素的既往事件率比调整:一种成对Cox似然方法
Stat Med. 2016 Dec 10;35(28):5149-5169. doi: 10.1002/sim.7051. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
9
Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effects.治疗效果的非参数界限与敏感性分析
Stat Sci. 2014 Nov;29(4):596-618. doi: 10.1214/14-STS499.