Schultz P, Anker-Møller E, Dahl J B, Christensen E F, Spangsberg N, Faunø P
Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Reg Anesth. 1991 Jan-Feb;16(1):34-7.
The anesthetic and side effects of a continuous lumbar plexus block ("3-in-1" block) were compared with that of epidurally administered morphine after open knee surgery. Twenty-two patients were randomized into two groups in this prospective, double-blind study. At the end of surgery, catheters were inserted for all the patients into both the femoral nerve sheath and the epidural space. Pain treatment was given as either bupivacaine in the femoral catheter or morphine in the epidural catheter, with saline in the other catheter. All treatments were given as a bolus dose followed by continuous infusion. If the patients had pain, they were given morphine intramuscularly on demand. The pain scores and supplemental morphine consumption were low in both groups and did not differ significantly. Lumbar plexus block produced a statistically significant a lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention. Although no significant differences in pain relief were shown between the two methods, we conclude that postoperative lumbar plexus block is preferable for postoperative pain relief because there is a lower frequency of side effects.
在膝关节开放手术后,对连续腰丛阻滞(“三合一”阻滞)的麻醉效果及副作用与硬膜外注射吗啡的情况进行了比较。在这项前瞻性双盲研究中,22例患者被随机分为两组。手术结束时,为所有患者在股神经鞘和硬膜外腔均插入导管。疼痛治疗时,股导管内注入布比卡因或硬膜外导管内注入吗啡,另一导管内注入生理盐水。所有治疗均先给予负荷剂量,然后持续输注。如果患者疼痛,按需给予肌内注射吗啡。两组的疼痛评分和补充吗啡用量均较低,且无显著差异。腰丛阻滞导致恶心、呕吐、瘙痒和尿潴留的发生率在统计学上显著较低。虽然两种方法在疼痛缓解方面未显示出显著差异,但我们得出结论,术后腰丛阻滞更适合用于术后疼痛缓解,因为其副作用发生率较低。