Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, M01-120, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Virol. 2010 Apr;84(7):3576-85. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02622-09. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
A substantial proportion of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals has cross-reactive neutralizing activity in serum, with a similar prevalence in progressors and long-term nonprogressors (LTNP). We studied whether disease progression in the face of cross-reactive neutralizing serum activity is due to fading neutralizing humoral immunity over time or to viral escape. In three LTNP and three progressors, high-titer cross-reactive HIV-1-specific neutralizing activity in serum against a multiclade pseudovirus panel was preserved during the entire clinical course of infection, even after AIDS diagnosis in progressors. However, while early HIV-1 variants from all six individuals could be neutralized by autologous serum, the autologous neutralizing activity declined during chronic infection. This could be attributed to viral escape and the apparent inability of the host to elicit neutralizing antibodies to the newly emerging viral escape variants. Escape from autologous neutralizing activity was not associated with a reduction in the viral replication rate in vitro. Escape from autologous serum with cross-reactive neutralizing activity coincided with an increase in the length of the variable loops and in the number of potential N-linked glycosylation sites in the viral envelope. Positive selection pressure was observed in the variable regions in envelope, suggesting that, at least in these individuals, these regions are targeted by humoral immunity with cross-reactive potential. Our results may imply that the ability of HIV-1 to rapidly escape cross-reactive autologous neutralizing antibody responses without the loss of viral fitness is the underlying explanation for the absent effect of potent cross-reactive neutralizing humoral immunity on the clinical course of infection.
相当一部分人类免疫缺陷病毒 1 型(HIV-1)感染者的血清中存在交叉中和活性,在进展者和长期非进展者(LTNP)中具有相似的流行率。我们研究了在存在交叉中和血清活性的情况下疾病进展是由于中和性体液免疫随时间逐渐减弱,还是由于病毒逃逸。在 3 名 LTNP 和 3 名进展者中,血清中针对多克隆 HIV-1 假病毒的高滴度交叉中和活性在整个感染过程中得到保留,即使在进展者中诊断出艾滋病后也是如此。然而,虽然来自所有 6 个人的早期 HIV-1 变体都可以被自身血清中和,但自身的中和活性在慢性感染过程中下降。这可能归因于病毒逃逸和宿主似乎无法产生针对新出现的病毒逃逸变体的中和抗体。对自身中和活性的逃逸与体外病毒复制率的降低无关。对自身具有交叉中和活性的血清的逃逸与包膜中可变环的长度增加和潜在 N-连接糖基化位点的数量增加同时发生。在包膜的可变区中观察到正选择压力,这表明,至少在这些个体中,这些区域是具有交叉中和潜力的体液免疫的靶标。我们的结果可能意味着,HIV-1 能够快速逃避交叉中和自身中和抗体反应而不丧失病毒适应性,这是交叉中和性体液免疫对感染临床过程无影响的根本解释。