Suppr超能文献

放大和协调调谱。

Amplification and consonant modulation spectra.

机构信息

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA. p-souza@ northwestern.edu

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):268-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fb9c.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In previous work, a simplified version of the modulation spectrum, the Spectral Correlation Index, was shown to be related to consonant error patterns. It is unknown what effect clinical amplification strategies will have on the modulation spectrum. Accordingly, the goals of this study were to examine the effect of clinical amplification strategies on the consonant modulation spectrum and to determine whether there was a relationship between the modulation spectrum and consonant errors for spectrally robust, amplified speech presented to listeners with hearing loss.

DESIGN

Participants were 13 adults (mean age, 67 yrs) with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Each listener was fit monaurally in the test ear with a 16-band, four-channel behind the ear hearing aid. One memory of the hearing aid was programmed with compression limiting amplification and one with fast-acting wide-dynamic range compression (WDRC) amplification. Twenty-two consonant-vowel syllables were presented to the listener and recorded at the output of the hearing aid using a probe microphone system. A modulation spectrum was obtained for each amplified and unamplified consonant-vowel. Consonant recognition was also measured for each listener.

RESULTS

Results show that (1) WDRC increased heterogeneity of the modulation spectrum across consonants and (2) for spectrally robust speech processed with either compression limiting or WDRC amplification, two consonants with similar modulation spectra are more likely to be confused with one another than are the two consonants with dissimilar modulation spectra.

CONCLUSION

These data expand and confirm earlier results linking the modulation spectrum to specific consonant errors.

摘要

目的

在之前的工作中,调制谱的简化版本——频谱相关指数,被证明与协同错误模式有关。目前尚不清楚临床放大策略会对调制谱产生什么影响。因此,本研究的目的是研究临床放大策略对协同调制谱的影响,并确定调制谱与听力损失患者听到的频谱稳健放大语音的协同错误之间是否存在关系。

设计

参与者为 13 名成年人(平均年龄,67 岁),患有轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失。每位听众在测试耳中均使用 16 频段、四通道耳后助听器进行单耳验配。助听器的一个记忆被编程为压缩限制放大,另一个记忆被编程为快速作用宽动态范围压缩(WDRC)放大。向听众呈现 22 个辅音-元音音节,并使用探头麦克风系统在助听器的输出端进行录制。为每个放大和未放大的辅音-元音获得调制谱。也为每位听众测量了协同识别。

结果

结果表明:(1)WDRC 增加了辅音间调制谱的异质性;(2)对于使用压缩限制或 WDRC 放大处理的频谱稳健语音,具有相似调制谱的两个辅音比具有不同调制谱的两个辅音更有可能相互混淆。

结论

这些数据扩展并证实了先前将调制谱与特定协同错误联系起来的结果。

相似文献

1
Amplification and consonant modulation spectra.放大和协调调谱。
Ear Hear. 2010 Apr;31(2):268-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fb9c.
10
Experiments with classroom FM amplification.课堂调频扩音实验。
Ear Hear. 1998 Jun;19(3):202-17. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199806000-00004.

引用本文的文献

3
Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?语音提示特征是否会影响对幅度包络失真的反应?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jun 4;64(6):2053-2069. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00481. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.首字母强度对词汇判断速度的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Apr;76(3):852-63. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0624-4.
9
Temporal resolution with a prescriptive fitting formula.采用规定拟合公式的时间分辨率。
Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):216-25. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/13-0001).
10
Application of the envelope difference index to spectrally sparse speech.信封差指数在谱稀疏语音中的应用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):824-37. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0301). Epub 2012 Jan 9.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验